Showing posts with label Hedge Funds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hedge Funds. Show all posts

Sunday, 20 December 2015

LATIN AMERICA’S TUG OF WAR



NEO-LIBERALISM VERSUS SOCIAL DEMOCRACY

Executive Summary:

Neo – liberal déjà vu of the 1990’s? How long will the new Argentine government last?

Non existing transparency: who funded the three ARGENTINE presidential candidates and what was the final campaign budget figure for each of the three candidates?

Marci and Wall Street - premature euphoria

New plutocracy government of ARGENTINA

Bountiful handouts for ARGENTINE'S economic elite

Questionable move: Elimination of ‘tax’ retention on agro-exports

Hedge fund spiral – the Marci, Paul Singer “connection”

Looming storm over ARGENTINA - devaluation and decline of purchasing power

The ARGENTINA IMF trauma

The earlier version of the ‘free-market experiment’ led to the most severe economic depression in ARGENTINE history

Speculators will grab their profits and run

Debatable - Presidential versus Parliamentary systems for LATAM countries

Crime and corruption are two of the world's largest multinational industries



Introduction: Pundits and commentators on the Left and Right are pronouncing ‘the end of the progressive cycle in LATIN AMERICA’. They cite the recent presidential elections:

1. ARGENTINA, where ultra-right Millionaire MAURICIO MACRI was elected;

2. BRAZIL, where President DILMA ROUSSEFF has appointed a neo-liberal ‘Chicago Boy’ economist, JOAQUIN LEVY, as Finance Minister and launched an IMF-style regressive structural adjustment policy designed to reduce social expenditures and attract financial speculators; and

3. VENEZUELA, where WASHINGTON allegedly channeled millions of dollars to far-right parties, as well as extra-parliamentary and paramilitary groups, to destabilize the center-left MADURO government; right-wing Democratic Unity Coalition (MUD) won the legislative elections in December 2015 with more than 2:1 margin over the CHAVISTA VENEZUELAN United Socialist Party (PSUV).

NEO – LIBERAL DÉJÀ VU OF THE 1990’S? HOW LONG WILL THE NEW GOVERNMENT LAST?

No doubt social legislation has come to a virtual halt, even before the recent political advances of the US-backed right-wing parties with their neo-liberal economic agenda.

But paralysis, and even retreat and electoral defeats of the center-left regimes, do not mean the return to the neo-liberal 1990’s, a period of privatizations, pillage and plunder, which had plunged millions into poverty, unemployment and marginality.

Whatever the current voting results, the collective memory of mass hardship, resulting from ‘free market’ policies, is seared in the memory of the vast majority of the working and middle class population.

Any attempt by the newly elected officials to ‘unmake and reverse’ the social advances of the past decade will be met with resistance, if not open class warfare, institutional and political constraints and low commodity prices drastically limiting export revenues.

A careful analysis of the policies proposed by the neo-liberal right, their implementation and impact will demonstrate their likely failure and the rapid demise of any new right-wing offensive.

ARGENTINA: PRESIDENT MACRI AND WALL STREET - PREMATURE EUPHORIA

In the upper income neighborhoods of BUENOS AIRES, there was singing and dancing in the streets as the Presidential election results rolled in and MAURICIO MACRI was pronounced thevictor. WALL STREET, the City of LONDON and their financial mouthpieces, the WALL STREET JOURNAL and the FINANCIAL TIMES, announced the coming of a new era and the end of ‘anti-investor, populism and nationalism, wasteful social spending’ referring to increases in pensions, family allowances and wages, approved by the previous center-left government

MACRI - THE PLUTOCRAT 

MAURICIO MACRI does not merely represent the plutocracy; he is one of the richest plutocrats in ARGENTINA. He not only boasts of a ‘carnal relationship’ with WASHINGTON in his acceptance speech, he pleasured US President OBAMA by announcing he would work to expel VENEZUELA from MERCOSUR, LATIN AMERICA’S foremost regional economic integration organization. (A promise on which he already had to backtrack)


MACRI announced a cabinet made up of hard-core neo-liberal economists and former supporters of the military dictatorship. He then spelled out his policy agenda, which had been cleverly hidden during his electoralcampaign when his raucous rhetoric for ‘change’, spoke to everybody and nobody.

BOUNTIFUL HANDOUTS FOR ARGENTINES ECONOMIC ELITE

MACRI promises to (1) end capital controls, export taxes and retention's on agro-business exports, (2) devaluation of the peso, (3) pay over $1.2 billion dollars of ARGENTINE public money to the WALL STREET vulture-speculator, PAUL SINGER, who had bought $49 million dollars of old ARGENTINE debt (a profit of astronomical proportions for buying paper), (4) most probably privatize and de-nationalize the state-owned airline, oil company and pension funds (5)sign-off on EU and US-centered free trade agreements, thus undermining LATIN AMERICA integration projects like MERCOSUR



In a word, the multi-millionaire playboy President plans harsh austerity for the ARGENTINE working class and bountiful handouts for the economic elite.

The day after the elections, local and overseas speculators boosted ARGENTINE stocks 40% anticipating the free market bonanza. GEORGE SOROS and hedge fund mogul, DANIEL LOEB, ‘piled into ARGENTINE assets’. Investment fund managers urged MACRI to act swiftly in imposing his ‘sweeping reforms’ before ARGENTINA’S famous capacity for mass popular resistance could be organized to resist his policies.

MACRI’S WALL STREET and WASHINGTON patrons are well aware that their clients’ boisterous big business bombast faces serious political obstacles because his policies will provoke severe economic hardships.

President MACRI does not even have a majority in Congress to approve his radical proposals. The congress is controlled by a coalition of rightwing and center-left Peronist parties, which will need to be coaxed, bought or coerced.

The ARGENTINE Congress will balk at supporting his entire neoliberal agenda. When he resorts to ‘executive decrees’ to bypass Congress, he will be contested in the courts, streets and legislature. It is doubtful he will be able to neutralize all his critics and implement his radical neoliberal agenda.

ELIMINATION OF ‘TAX’ RETENTION ON AGRO-EXPORTS WILL DECREASE GOVERNMENT REVENUES, EXACERBATING THE FISCAL DEFICIT AND NECESSITATING DEEPER REDUCTIONS IN SOCIAL EXPENDITURES

The head of the Central Bank, ALEJANDRO VANOLI, who was appointed by the previous center-left FERNANDEZ government, did not go along with MACRI’S tight money policy, radical devaluation and fiscal austerity and resigned his position, giving MACRI the chance to nominate one of his  free market crony. However, the institutional damage will increase the general sense of a lawless regime willing to trample the constitutional order to impose his free market dogma.

MACRI’S implementation of eliminating ‘tax’ retention on agro-exports will decrease government revenues, exacerbating the fiscal deficit and necessitating deeper reductions in social expenditures. The contrast between higher earnings for the agro-business elite and lower living standards for labor is an invitation to greater class hostility and strife. Even more decisive MACRI’S “export strategy” will be undermined by the low world demand and prices of ARGENTINE commodity exports.

ARGENTINA IN FOR A ROUGH RIDE

MACRI’S elimination of capital and price controls will provoke a major devaluation of the peso which may exceed 60%. This will automatically result in severe increases in the price of consumer goods and increased profits for the export elites, provoking mass unrest across the occupational spectrum.

MACRI promises to meet with the 7% of speculator hold-outs of old ARGENTINE debt (from the pillage years of the 1990’s) demanding full payment with interest, especially the ‘vulture funds’ led by WALL STREET’S PAUL SINGER of ELLIOTT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT. Pay-offs of over $1.3 billion on an original $49 million purchase of ARGENTINE debt to WALL STREET speculators will provoke fury among ARGENTINE workers and nationalists who will shoulder the added burden on top of austerity and cuts in social welfare.

HEDGE FUND SPIRAL – THE MACRI, PAUL SINGER “CONNECTION”!

Moreover, the 93% of debt holders, who had agreed to the ‘financial haircut’ and discounted the debt at 70% will now demand full payment multiplying tenfold the demands on the Treasury with disastrous consequences. But then it is rumored MACRI’S campaignwas allegedly partially funded by PAUL SINGER and some powerful media moguls, thus it comes as no surprise that this administration is eager to settle with the HEDGE FUNDS, despite the fact that even the UN condemns HEDGE FUNDS practices on sovereign states. 
  
HIDDEN AGENDA

The devaluation and decline of purchasing power will not attract the ‘tidal wave of foreign investment’ to lift the economy and provide jobs and general prosperity as MACRI had promised during his campaign.

Foreign capital will not create new enterprises; they will concentrate on buying existing privatized public enterprises at fire-sale prices. Incoming capital will not increase the productive forces; it will only shift the direction of the flow of profits from public coffers to private pockets, from the domestic economy to overseas investors.

NEO-LIBERALISM: THEN AND NOW

The general foreign and domestic political climate is vastly different today from the 1990’s when the previous neo-liberal experiment was launched with such disastrous consequences. In the late 1980’s, ARGENTINA was suffering from acute inflation, stagnation and declining income. The working class organizations were still recovering from the murderous decade of military rule. Moreover, in the 1990’s the US was at the pinnacle of imperial power in LATIN AMERICA. CHINA was only beginning its dynamic growth cycle. The USSR had disintegrated and RUSSIA was a struggling vassal state. LATIN AMERICA was ruled by a motley collection of neo-liberal clones under the thumb of the IMF.

THE IMF TRAUMA

Today MACRI faces an more organized working class. The trade unions and militant popular movements are intact and have experienced a decade of substantial gains under a center-left government, even if they don’t admit it publicly, - yet . The IMF experience remains apoisonous memory for hundreds of thousands of ARGENTINES. Hundreds of military officials responsible for crimes against humanity have been arrested, tried and prosecuted under the out-going regime. The threat of a military coup, ever-present in the 1980’s and 90’s, is non-existent. CHINA has become the key market for ARGENTINE agro exports (soya). MACRI, despite his declared passion to serve WASHINGTON, is obligated to accommodate to the CHINESE market.



Any moves out of MERCOSUR and into the arms of the Transpacific Trade Agreement will prejudice ARGENTINA’S strategic trade links with BRAZIL, VENEZUELA, URUGUAY AND PARAGUAY. Today MACRI will find a hostile climate in LATIN AMERICA for his proposed embrace of the US.

THE EARLIER VERSION OF THE ‘FREE-MARKET EXPERIMENT’ LED TO THE MOST SEVERE ECONOMIC DEPRESSION IN ARGENTINE HISTORY

In summary, MACRI will find it most likely impossible to replicate the neoliberal policies of the 1990’s for all the above reasons. There is one additional factor to consider: The earlier version of the ‘free-market experiment’ led to the most severe economic depression in ARGENTINE history with double-digit negative growth, unemployment exceeding 50% in working class districts (and 25% nationally) and poverty and extreme misery in some ARGENTINE provinces exceeding SUB-SAHARA AFRICA.

SPECULATORS WILL GRAB THEIR PROFITS AND RUN

If MACRI believes he can rush through the “harsh medicine” – and avoid the inevitable mass protest– while attracting a massive inflow of capital with which to rapidly grow the economy, he is gravely mistaken. After the initial giveaways and uptake of the stock market, the SOROS and LOEB speculators will grab their profits and run. Weakened domestic consumption and the depressed global commodity market do not attract long term, large-scale capital.

The real question is not (as the financial pundits claim) whether MACRI will ‘seize the opportunity’ but how soon after he tries to impose his free market model his regime will crash amid the ruins of a depressed economy, raging inflation and general strikes.

ARGENTINA WOULD DO GOOD TO CHANGE FROM PRESIDENTIAL TO A PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM

In view of past experience and current circumstances, some political observers have doubts that this administration will finish its 4 year term (if democratic values are respected). The question is what entity will replace it? In order to prosper, ARGENTINA should change its constitution and move from a presidential system to a parliamentary EUROPEAN style system, thus political continuity would be manifested and a multiple party systems form real coalitions. A model that has proven a success in regards to stability and prosperity in central EUROPE for the last 80 years.

BRAZIL: RIGHT TURN OR A LEFT OPPORTUNITY

Commentators left and right cite the vertical decline of support for President DILMA ROUSSEFF from over 50% to less than 10% as a sign of the ‘decline of the left’. Judicial investigations have led to the arrest and prosecution of dozens of Congressional leaders of the so-called ‘Workers Party”’ (PT) for wholesale bribery, money laundering and illicit transfers of millions of dollars!

Prosecutors have jailed scores of PT officials, legislators and senior executives of the giant public petroleum company, PETROBRAS, the directors of the biggest construction companies and investment banks who were partners in crime with former PT President LULA DA SILVA. The one-time trade union leader, President LULA, turned into a poster boy for WALL STREET and more recently a notorious influence peddler for BRAZILIAN big businesses.

Prosecutors have arrested 117 officials from PETROBRAS, the giant state oil corporation, and BRAZIL’S biggest company. They have arrested two of BRAZIL’S most powerful capitalists: MARCELO ODEBRECHT, president of CONSTRUCTORA NORBERTO ODEBRECHT, and OCTAVIO MARQUEZ DE AZEVEDO of the ANDRADE GUTIERREZ CORPORATION. Both contributed to the Workers Party electoral campaign of ex-President LULA DA SILVA and current President DILMA ROUSSEFF.


Big business contributors, currently under investigation or jailed, had received forty-times the value of their political donations in terms of lucrative PT government contracts (a 4000% return on investment!).

Criminal cases and arrests for ‘bribes for contracts’ schemes have affected the financial sector, including the billionaire financier ANDRE ESTEVES, founder-President of BTG PACTUAL, a close friend and associate of LULA DA SILVA.

The entire elite of BRAZIL’S capitalist and financial class has been indicted, jailed or is under investigation. The Treasurer of the PT, Senate and Congressional leaders and Presidential advisers of the ‘Workers’ Party have been arrested and jailed for bribes, money laundering and fraud, in connection with the PETROBRAS and other corporate corruption scandals.

A MYSTERY, ARGENTINE'S CAMPAIGN FUNDING – WHO FUNDED THEM AND HOW MUCH DID THE CAMPAIGNS OF EACH OF THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES COST? 



Interestingly  enough during the entire election campaign in ARGENTINA none of the mainstream media, both locally and internationally ever asked the parties or candidates who was funding them and what the campaign budgets ceiling was. Why, because in each case local and international media moguls and financial institutions or so-called shadow banks with clear agendas on Argentina apparently funded them and thus made sure that none of this information was made public.  And strangely enough no one questioned it. So much for transparency.

The victory of hard right neo-liberal MAURICIO MACRI in ARGENTINA and the disintegration of the PT do not augur a new rightwing cycle in LATIN AMERICA.

TUG OF WAR IN SOUTH AMERICA


MACRI’S economic team will quickly confront mass opposition and, outside the upper class neighborhoods, they lack any political mass support. Their policies will polarize the country and undermine the stability, which investors require. Brutal devaluations and the end of capital controls are formulas, not for economic development, but for inciting general strikes. Conflict, stagnation and hyperinflation will put an end to the enthusiasm of local and foreign investors.

Moreover, MACRI cannot embrace WASHINGTON’S entire agenda because ARGENTINA’S natural trading partner is CHINA.

Macri’s regime is the beginning and the end of a reversion to the neo-liberal disaster, similar to what took place at the end of the 1990’s. Unless he manages to obtain enough funds to reduce the burden on ARGENTINA’S poor and middle class. But since he will get into debts with the IMF, this will hardly be the case.  

The fall of the PT, more a product of conscientious prosecutors than the action of trade unions and social movements, opens political space for new working class struggles, free from the constraints of corrupt leaders and bureaucrats.

Even if the Right returns to power in BRAZIL– it is tainted with the same stench of corruption; its capitalist partners are in jail or facing prosecution. In other words, the fall of the PT is only part of the decline and decay of all the capitalist parties.
Over time, soon after the collapse of the ‘New Right’, a new authentic alternative political entity may emerge, free of corruption and links to big business.

Adapted by Geopolitical Analysis and Monitoring from the original article published and written by James Petras 
































Tuesday, 8 December 2015

CORPORATOCRACY – THE ARGENTINE WAY




THE NEW TECHNOCRATIC GOVERNMENT OF ARGENTINA

Most of MACRI'S reported appointees were privately educated in ARGENTINA and went on to do further studies in elite USA universities.
For those who oppose neoliberalism its seems amazing that ARGENTINA still has not learnt from the effects of Neoliberalism, for the new president will once again be the puppet of WASHINGTON, just as CARLOS MENEM had shown how it is done – the current misery ARGENTINA is in goes back to arch – neoliberal DOMINGO CAVALLO.

A GOOD KING (PRESIDENT) IS NEVER BETTER THAN A BAD PARLIAMENT
Unfortunately ARGENTINA has a presidential system ….

Geo-politically speaking it seems that neoliberalism is currently winning the game, with the help of the “fight against terror” doctrine as well as the corporate media. As some political observers indicated, one cannot permanently resist the doctrines of the international finance mafia, so governments opposing these policies have to be changed and run by technocrats who are submissive to international corporations, financial institutions thus creating the de – facto CORPORATOCRACY. 
  
Background Information: MANCHESTER LIBERALISM



THE GEOPOLITICS OF INTERNATIONAL MONETARY AND FINANCIAL SYSTEMS

ELLIOT CAPITAL HEDGE FUNDS, A CLIENT AND SHAREHOLDER OF FITCH RATING AGENCY?

US COURT RULING ON ARGENTINE BOND DEFAULT- THE PARIS CLUB, USA AGRICULTURE COMPANIES, AND INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SPECULATORS “GRAB” FOR ARGENTINA

MONEY MAKES THE WORLD GO ROUND – AND LOTS OF MONEY IS AT STAKE IN ARGENTINA

RATING AGENCIES, THE FEDERAL RESERVE, THE PARIS CLUB, THE IMF, brokers and speculator


PAYMENT TO HEDGE FUNDS WILL INVOLVE HUGE TRANSFER OF RESOURCES AND PENSIONS FROM WORKERS TO WALL STREET

MACRI had promised to end ARGENTINA’S isolation from WALL STREET financial markets through negotiations with vulture funds that hold ARGENTINE debt and to remove regulations that allegedly stand in the way of big business investments. The payment of that debt, even under favorable terms for ARGENTINA, will undoubtedly require a huge transfer of resources and pensions from workers to WALL STREET.


MACRI has also promised to devalue the ARGENTINE peso and remove transportation, energy and other subsidies to the poor and middle class. Devaluation, attacks on social programs, deregulation—each of these measures represent an assault on jobs and living standards. But thanks to the corporate media a small majority of working class ARGENTINE voters have succumb into believing that this model is the best for them. 

ECONOMIC HIT –MEN – TARGET LATIN AMERICA  

LATIN AMERICA is currently facing a standoff between Neoliberalism fostered by the USA and UK versus Social Democracy. Thus it comes of no surprise that also the current center left BRAZILIAN administration is under scrutiny for corruption, the scandal strategically made public during a period where the BRAZILIAN economy is stagnating. Its seems the decade old fight between left and right is once again fought on the grounds of good old LATIN AMERICA.  

Background Information: ARGENTINE'S GLOOMY FUTURE

IMF PLEADS GUILTY BUT INSISTS ON AUSTERITY

WALL STREET ANIMOSITY AGAINST ARGENTINA

LATAM NOT ADHERING TO VULTURE FINANCE SYSTEM DICTATED BY IMF, WORLD BANK AND CORPORATIONS


Thus it comes as no surprise that MAURICO MACRI a multi-millionaire engineer,   who de-facto was elected by the neo-liberal US finance elite and corporations won the election. 

Following the footsteps of CARLOS MENEM and arch – neoliberalist DOMINGO CAVALLO,

MACRI chose a technocratic cabinet which showcases CORPORATOCRACY, made in the USA - at its best:

Ministry of Finance

EX WALL STREET BANKER AT THE HELM OF THE FINANCE MINISTRY: Alfonso PRAT GAY, an economist trained at PENNSYLVANIA University and former WALL STREET banker with J.P. MORGAN in LONDON and NEW YORK, President of ARGENTINA'S Central Bank. Like MACRI, he went to school at the elite conservative CARDINAL NEWMAN COLLEGE in BUENOS AIRES.

Foreign Ministry

A CEO AND MANAGER OF INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AT THE HELM OF THE FOREIGN MINISTRY: Susana MALCORRA has a predominant business background, having worked for companies including IBM and TELECOM ARGENTINA as well for the UNITED NATIONS.

Cabinet chief

A TECHNOCRATIC CABINET - MARCOS PENA CABINET CHIEF - US educated, where his father worked for the INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK. With economic decisions now taken by a sub-cabinet of six ministries, PEÑA has turned to two businessmen - GUSTAVO LOPETEGUI, the current CEO of LAN ARGENTINA, and MARIO QUINTANA, president of PEGASUS VENTURE CAPITAL - as his cabinet secretaries.

Energy Ministry

FORMER SHELL CEO JUAN JOSE ARANGUREN WILL BE MINISTER OF ENERGY AND MINES. He will be in charge of attracting investment to the VACA MUERTA formation, the world’s second-largest shale gas deposit and fourth-largest shale oil reservoir. He’ll also head up attempts to unravel the current government’s system of utility bill subsidies.


See: ARGENTINE SHALE GAS PRODUCTION COULD ALTER THE SOUTHERN CONES GEOPOLITICAL LANDSCAPE

US COMPANY CHEVRON REGAINS FOOTHOLD IN ARGENTINA’S OIL SECTOR


Ministry of interior

FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE CITY-RUN BANK BANCO CIUDAD ROGELIO FRIGERIO will be minister of the interior. He is the grandson of ROGELIO JULIO FRIGERIO, who acted as economic adviser to former President ARTURO FRONDIZI and pushed for the development of ARGENTINA’S industries.

Central Bank chief

FORMER BANKER TO HEAD ARGENTINA'S CENTRAL BANK: FEDERICO STURZENEGGER, a lawmaker, former banker and chief economist of the then private oil company YPF, who studied at top USA school of MASSACHUSETTS Institute of Technology.

Minister of Industry

FORMER US TRAINED BANKER FRANCISCO CABRERA WILL BE INDUSTRY MINISTER. CABRERA formerly worked for US tech company HEWLETT PACKARD, international bank HSBC and other financial groups.

Minister of Defense

JULIO MARTINEZ IS CURRENTLY THE VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE DEFENSE COMMITTEE of the ARGENTINIAN Chamber of Deputies, and has previously served as its chair. MARTINEZ has been a strident critic of outgoing President CRISTINA FERNANDEZ DE KIRCHNER'S defense policies. MARTINEZ will take charge of ARGENTINA'S defense policy at a challenging time, as the ongoing delays to the country's program to replace its retired DASSAULT MIRAGE III fleet leave it with little significant air-defense capability.

GOVERNMENT OF THE TECHNOCRATS, BY THE TECHNOCRATS, FOR THE TECHNOCRATS

It seems that if democratically elected leaders do not heed to debt ridden economic models in order to satisfy the markets, the IMF, WORLD BANK, HEDGE FUNDS and other financial institutions, they are now, in effect, summarily dismissed, one way or the other. In the case of ARGENTINA with the help of the corporate media and powerful international financial institutions. Granted the outgoing administration had its flaws, but the main reason the administration was under such heavy attack by neoliberal entities was because they defied the classic economic model of the neoliberals and managed to succeeded, which infuriated them and also posed a threat to their own geopolitical agenda. 

Background Information: IMF and ARGENTINA

When ARGENTINA was the “Sunny boy” of the IMF under president MENEM, who unquestionably followed IMF doctrine of privatizing state assets......................................

CORPORATOCRACY...... ARGENTINA’S DEFAULT IN 2001, WHICH MANY ARGUE WAS CAUSED TO A LARGE EXTEND BY THE IMF.......

ARGENTINA HAS REFUSED TO SWALLOW THE IMF’S BELT-TIGHTENING RECIPES

The unsubtle message coming out of the neoliberal quarters is that democratic governments which have failed to tackle the economic crisis should be replaced with more reliable (and controllable) technocratic governments.

This to some extend occurred in ARGENTINA. With the help of the corporate media the economic situation was deliberately presented in a bleaker picture than it actually was. Granted inflation is an issue the new government has to solve, but at which price? The doctrines of Technocratic governments, controlled by corporations and financial institutions usually have only one objective: painful austerity and subsequent falling living standards. Technocracy will have no answers for growing popular discontent.

Rule by technocrats will replace rule by the people - with economically orthodox international bodies like the IMF, WORLD BANK and SHADOW BANKING INSTITUTIONS working with technocrats now heading up governments to implement tough austerity measures that have never received public backing. With the exception of ARGENTINA!!!!!

DEMOCRACY MUST NOT BE REGARDED AS MERELY AN OPTIONAL EXTRA WHEN SOLVING ECONOMIC PROBLEMS.

The growing power of international bodies (corporations) has steadily diminished democracy. To an extent, the “imposition” of technocrats on ARGENTINA is the apotheosis of the technocratic concept that runs through bodies such as the IMF and the WORLD BANK as well as the Paris club and the Federal Reserve.


Government of the technocrats, by the technocrats, and for the technocrats is hugely undesirable and, by its very nature, bad for democratic legitimacy. It is not a long-term solution and should not have been considered as a short-term one. Democracy must not be regarded as merely an optional extra when solving economic problems.

If politicians do not bring their people with them, they risk creating extreme alienation and discontent. If politicians do not trust the people, why should the people trust their politicians? When they are working to solve the so-called economic crisis engulfing ARGENTINA, the countries new leader must be very careful that he does not create a new crisis of political legitimacy, which will have even more serious long-term consequences.

Background Information:

ARGENTINA, BARELY 30 YEARS OF DEMOCRACY, A YOUNG NATION TRYING TO FIND ITS BEARING

 ARGENTINE’S "INVISIBLE OPPOSITION", (Now visible opposition 2015) still CONSISTING OF SELF - SEEKING ONE MAN SHOWS, WHO USE CORPORATE MEDIA TO OPPOSE THE GOVERNMENT

ARGENTINA AT A CROSSROAD


ARGENTINA, A YOUNG DEMOCRACY STILL TRYING TO FIND ITS POLITICAL BEARING

One step forward, two back
But then again maybe it’s in the best of interest for ARGENTINA to experience 4 years of a center right non Peronist Government in order to have a true comparison between the center left Peronism model of the last 12 years, the MENEM Peronist area and now the neoliberal (or as some say extreme right Manchester liberalism) area of MAURICIO MACRI, thus the young country (33 years of democracy) will have gone through all political models and therefor will be able to decide which of these political models is best for the country. After all the Tango is an ARGENTINE invention, one step forward, two steps back, depending on which side of the political model you are on ……………….