LATEST
ACTOR IN THE FAKE PANDEMIC PLAY?
ZIKA is the latest health scare to
dominate the headlines of the MSM (Mainstream Media). The WHO (World Health Organization) declared a “Public Health
Emergency of International Concern” on February 1st, 2016.
They
stated that “the experts agreed that a causal relationship between Zika infection
during pregnancy and microcephaly is strongly suspected, though not yet
scientifically proven.”
Did you catch that – not
scientifically proven? However, the lack of scientific proof has not stopped
all sorts of fear-mongering by the MSM and Governments around the world.
Apologists for this may claim it’s better to be prepared than not, but you have
to wonder about that kind of preparation when Governments like those in El
Salvador have actually instructed their citizens not to have sex! Before getting
overly scared, paranoid or doing a “ZIKA freaka”, it’s worthwhile investigating
the issue further. Is ZIKA a real threat? If so, is it a bioweapon or an agent
of bio-terrorism or bio-warfare? Or is this another fake pandemic like EBOLA,
SARS, H1N1 and many others before it?
Background Information:
WHO UNDER THE THUMB OF THE PHARMA INDUSTRY
WHO UNDER SCRUTINY FOR TIES TO PHARMA INDUSTRY IN REGARDS TO
H1N1 PANDEMIC
World Health Organization
director Margaret Chan who proclaim the so-called
swine flu a "pandemic" had close ties to companies that manufacture
vaccines and antiviral medicines like Tamiflu, a fact that WHO did not publicly
disclose.
The links between the advisers and the companies that make money from vaccines and flu treatments were detailed in a report
published online by the British medical journal BMJ, which investigated the advisers' role in WHO's policy.
THE
ZIKA VIRUS – ANOTHER FAKE PANDEMIC LIKE EBOLA?
It’s pretty early on in the life
of the current ZIKA phenomenon – and at this stage one would suggest calling it
the ZIKA phenomenon rather than the ZIKA outbreak. However, the ZIKA virus itself
has been round a long time – since at least 1947. Guess who owns the patent for
the ZIKA virus? None other than at the Rockefeller Corporation. The
Rockefellers are, of course, one of the most wealthy and powerful New World
Order families. And, we know that Western Medicine is Rockefeller Medicine, all
the way …
During the EBOLA scare of 2014,
which turned out to essentially be a fake pandemic. In an article called “EBOLA:
Hoaxing It Up!” the author of the article pointed out the clues which showed
that the whole thing was a fearmongering scam, and that whatever danger the
virus posed was being blown way out of proportion.
For instance, people were
treating a supposedly delay virus in a ridiculous way, e.g. by walking through EBOLA-infected
water with sandals. The Government was clearly using crisis actors, just as
they do with all the false flag events of recent years. At the time, almost all
the MSM and even many in the alternative media were hyping the threat,
knowingly or not.
However, there was one man who
stood his ground and insisted the whole thing was a hoax: Jon Rappoport. Jon
has studied these pandemics very carefully over the years, from AIDS to SARS to
EBOLA and more, and has the best grasp of these issues. His conclusion with ZIKA
is the same as with EBOLA: the ZIKA phenomenon is a hoax, using the cover story
of a “deadly virus” to hide other uncomfortable truths. It is full of unfounded
assertions and presumptions, and based on little or no evidence.
SOME
KEY ZIKA QUESTIONS
1. Where is the evidence of an “epidemic”,
i.e. a sizeable number of disease cases in a geographic area, or a “pandemic”,
i.e. a disease prevalent over a whole country or the world? The latest figures
via Rappoport (who quotes from a SAO PAULO newspaper article) are that 4783
suspected cases of microcephaly have been reported, that only 404 cases of the
4783 have been confirmed as having microcephaly, and that only 17 cases of the
404 have been linked to the ZIKA virus. (Microcephaly is defined as “abnormal
smallness of the head, a congenital condition associated with incomplete brain
development”; there are an average of 25,000 cases annually in the US alone.)
Remember,
this is a final figure of 17 in BRAZIL, with some more reported in some other
countries. Yet, the BBC dutifully reports the WHO predicting upwards of
4,000,000 ZIKA cases in 2016! That’s 17 vs 4 million!
2. Even if there were tens of
thousands of cases spreading rapidly, where is the evidence that ZIKA is the
cause of the microcephaly? After all, microcephaly can be caused by a variety
of genetic and environmental factors, according to the Mayo Clinic.
Some of these
“factors”, as it were, are actually deliberate pesticides poisons such as
glyphosate, atrazine and metolachlor (all sprayed in BRAZIL).
Often
the real causes of a disease, whether it is an outbreak or not, are not as
sexy, sensational or “newsworthy” as the MSM and Government likes them to be:
lack of sanitation, lack of hygiene, lack of nutrition, endemic poverty,
exposure to toxins, vaccine damage, pesticide intake, Big Pharma drug effects,
etc. It becomes
even more interesting when you consider that the toxins potentially causing the
disease are the very ones sold by people and corporations (e.g. Big Biotech
pesticides) that also own those same MSM channels and outlets …
3. Even if there were a true
epidemic or pandemic, what is the justification for calling for people to not
have sex, and for women to have abortions at sea? Is this not utterly insane
and tyrannical? The fearmongering has reached the point where people are being
manipulated into killing their babies just because they might have ZIKA – and
that ZIKA might cause microcephaly in their children?
THE
2 USELESS TESTS THAT FORM THE BASIS OF PANDEMIC PROPAGANDA
Whenever a story of disease
epidemic or pandemic breaks on the MSM, if you want to know the truth of it,
here’s a handy litmus test. See if the reports are based on either the Antibody
test or the PCR test. Both of them fail to ultimately prove whether the dreaded
virus in question is the cause of a so-called pandemic. As Rappoport explains:
“When a test shows that
antibodies geared to a specific virus/villain (like ZIKA) are present in the
body, it means the body has contacted that ZIKA virus—if the test was done well
and didn’t come up with a falsely-positive result. False positives are
frequent. But more disastrously, proving
the body had contact with a specific virus says absolutely nothing about
whether the patient is sick or will get sick.
In fact, before 1985, a positive antibody test
was generally taken to be a good sign: the body’s immune system had encountered
and overcome the invader. After 1985, the “science” was turned upside down: a
positive test meant the person was sick or going to get sick.”
So much for the Antibody test –
it only shows if the body has developed antibodies to a particular virus. That
doesn’t tell us if the virus is still present, and what the implications are
for the person’s current and future health. Here’s what the PCR test does:
“The PCR is a very sophisticated
and tricky test to run. It is prone to errors. It takes a tiny, tiny amount of
material assumed to be a fragment of a virus, and it amplifies (blows up) that
fragment so it can be observed. The first problem with the test is: did
technicians indeed choose a tiny sample that actually is a piece of the virus
in question? Or is it simply a bit of genetic debris? The second problem is:
the test, despite claims to the contrary, says nothing reliable about the
amount of virus (like ZIKA) that is in the patient’s body. Why is this
important? Because you need a great deal of virus in the body to begin to say
it is causing disease. A very small amount is trivial.”
The PCR test is qualitative, not
quantitative. It shows if a virus is present, but it tells us nothing about the
quantity or virulence of the virus. It is inconclusive. It simply can’t tell
you whether it a virus is present enough in large or dangerous enough
quantities to actually cause disease.
IS
ZIKA REALLY ABOUT POPULATION CONTROL?
Step back and take a look at the
whole ZIKA phenomenon for a minute. First, it began a long time ago with a Rockefeller patent in
1947; then, it gets triggered by GE (genetically engineered) mosquitoes
released by Oxitec (with funding from Bill Gates); then, Oxitec makes the
mistake of not taking into account the amount of tetracycline in the pesticides
in the area, thus rendering their GE mosquito idea null. Then, what
are the solutions that the MSM and Government propose? More Big Biotech, Big
Agra and Big Pharma intervention, of course: more GE mosquitoes (they’ll be
better this time, we promise!), more pesticides and more vaccines.
Is the pattern of these fake
pandemics becoming more obvious?
IF
NOTHING ELSE, ZIKA IS AT LEAST A NEW ANGLE AT POPULATION CONTROL
Knowing the penchant that the alleged
New World Order architects have for depopulation, we can at least say, if
nothing else, that ZIKA is a novel angle at population control. The NWO
conspirators have found a new excuse to tell people not to have sex and to
promote more abortion. Eugenicist Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World,
which describes a future society where reproduction is strictly controlled by
the State, would have been proud.
Who Owns the Zika Virus?
The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the Zika virus a global health emergency on Monday (February 1) without providing much detail on the disease. So here are some facts until we receive more information:
This sexually-transmitted virus has been around for 69 years and is marketed by two companies: LGC Standards (headquartered in the UK) and ATCC (headquartered in the US).
The LGC Group is:
“…the UK’s designated National Measurement Institute for chemical and bioanalytical measurements and an international leader in the laboratory services, measurement standards, reference materials, genomics and proficiency testing marketplaces.”
One of its branches, LGC Standards, is:
“…a leading global producer and distributor of reference materials and proficiency testing schemes. Headquartered in Teddington, Middlesex, UK, LGC Standards has a network of dedicated sales offices extending across 20 countries in 5 continents and more than 30 years experience in the distribution of reference materials. These high quality products and services are essential for accurate analytical measurement and quality control, ensuring sound decisions are made based on reliable data. We have an unparalleled breadth of ISO Guide 34 accredited reference material production in facilities at 4 sites across the UK, the US and Germany.”
LGC Standards entered into a partnership with ATCC, of which the latter is:
“…the premier global biological materials resource and standards organization whose mission focuses on the acquisition, authentication, production, preservation, development, and distribution of standard reference microorganisms, cell lines, and other materials. While maintaining traditional collection materials, ATCC develops high quality products, standards, and services to support scientific research and breakthroughs that improve the health of global populations.”
This “ATCC-LGC Partnership” is designed to facilitate:
“…the distribution of ATCC cultures and bioproducts to life science researchers throughout Europe, Africa, and India and [...] to make access to the important resources of ATCC more easily accessible to the European, African, and Indian scientific communities through local stock holding of more than 5,000 individual culture items supported by our local office network delivering the highest levels of customer service and technical support.”
And who owns the patent on the virus? The Rockefeller Foundation!
Why has the issue of patent ownership of the Zika virus not been the object of media coverage?
Lest we forget the words of David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991:
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. … It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
Is the ownership of the Zika Virus by the Rockefeller Foundation part of that agenda of “supernational sovereignty [dominated] by an intellectual elite and world bankers…”?
Of significance, the Zika virus is a commodity which can be purchased online from the ATCC-LGC for 599 euros, with royalties accruing to the Rockefeller Foundation.
The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Guillaume Kress, Global Research, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment