SYRIAN EQUATION

Below article was originally published on this Blog 

15 October 2014!!!!

USA: GEOPOLITICS OF A WORLD POWER

HOW TO LOSE A WAR: WHEN YOUR ALLIES AID YOUR ENEMIES 

"It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world."  
- George Washington, Farewell Address   

“Be careful of your enemy once and of your friend a thousand times, for a double crossing friend knows more evil.” 
- Arabic Proverb 

Via Eurasia Review

“FREE SYRIAN ARMY” WAS NOTHING MORE THAN A QATARI MYTH

Recently, ISIS established an agreement with moderate-in-comparison SYRIAN rebels to not fight each other so that they can focus on destroying the SYRIAN government.1 As early as 2013,  we had already established that nearly half of the SYRIAN rebels were jihadis affiliated with al-Qaeda, Jabhat al Nursra and ISIS. As CHARLES LISTER observed, "The insurgency is now dominated by groups which have at least an Islamist viewpoint on the conflict. The idea that it is mostly secular groups leading the opposition is just not borne out."2  In retrospect, the “Free Syrian Army” was nothing more than “a Qatari myth.”3 Regardless, on September 18, the Senate passed a redundant bill supporting Obama’s plan to fund, train and arm the mysterious ‘moderate’ SYRIAN rebels –ostensibly to battle the Islamic State and the SYRIAN government. Displaying his characteristic indifference to reality, upon the bill’s passing, Obama declared, "When you harm our citizens, when you threaten the UNITED STATES, when you threaten our allies, it doesn't divide us, it unites us."4  

Background Information: In October 2012 we wrote:

THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT “FOREIGN FIGHTERS” ARE INVOLVED—MOSTLY ISLAMIC JIHADISTS FROM SAUDI ARABIA, IRAQ, LIBYA, JORDAN, AND TURKEY
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com/2012/10/syria-and-dogs-of-war.html

PROXY WAR WAGED BY THE GULF COUNTRIES AGAINST IRAN AND OTHER NON-SUNNIS 

Even by Obama’s standards, this was a bit rich. After all, it was ISIS, which benefitted greatly from SAUDI policy in IRAQ and SYRIA,5 that murdered AMERICAN journalist JAMES FOLEY only four weeks earlier –reminding the world that AMERICA’S most dominant ally has been supporting jihadi groups that not only terrorize innocent people in AFRICA, EUROPE, and the MIDDLE EAST, but more famously, AMERICANS themselves–as the unprecedented terrorist attacks of 9/11 show. Moreover, the UNITED STATES and its allies have already been funding, training and arming the SYRIAN rebels from the outset of the civil war –a proxy war waged by the GULF countries against IRAN and other non-Sunnis in the region.6  

   

SAUDI ARABIA of course, is not the only ally which supports violent jihadi groups on an international scale. Other allies that aid and abet terrorists and foreign fighters include QATAR, TURKEY, and KUWAIT -with no sanction whatsoever from the UNITED STATES. On the contrary, they enjoy generous political and economic solidarity, shape AMERICAN foreign policy and have successfully subverted the AMERICAN military into a kind of foreign legion of the GULF states, drawing the UNITED STATES into perpetual wars against governments and nations that pose no security threats to AMERICA. Such wars not only squander American lives, resources and reputation but also distract and impede the UNITED STATES from comprehensively combating the genuine security threats of international jihad.  

ISIS HAS BEEN A SAUDI PROJECT
  

Over two hundred years ago, THOMAS JEFFERSON stated: "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations-entangling alliances with none."7  In this context, it is crucial to assess the nature of AMERICAN alliances today and rectify relationships that threaten AMERICAN security and interests.  To truly combat this threat, it is important to first review the nature and status of AMERICAN alliances and second, to understand how the UNITED STATES’ own democratic deficits allowed it to become a leader not of its own interests but a military and foreign policy tool of its allies –a subordinate hatchet man to its powerful friends rather than an equal partner representing its own interests and principles. 

SAUDI ARABIA 
   

“ISIS has been a SAUDI project.”  -Qatari official.8’  

“If you can kill a disbelieving AMERICAN or EUROPEAN…rely upon Allah, and kill him” - ABU MOHAMMED AL-ADNANI, ISIS Spokesman    

Only a day before the bill was passed, on September 17, 2014,  MUFID ELFGEEH, a naturalized AMERICAN citizen from YEMEN, was indicted by a grand jury for attempting to buy two handguns, recruit fighters for ISIS, kill members of the U.S. military and the Shia community, and for illegally possessing firearms silencers. Authorities said ELFGEEH also described his plan to go on a shooting spree of returning U.S. military members to support ISIS.9   Ironically enough, the UNITED STATES may indict its own citizens for supporting terrorist groups like ISIS, but studiously refuses to indict its own allies for doing the same.  In one short year, ISIS made remarkable strides both in SYRIA and neighboring IRAQ, all but marginalizing the rebels and establishing a strong base in both countries. ISIS, an al-Qaeda off-shoot that later eclipsed al-Qaeda and is now competing with it, owes its rapid expansion in no small part to the aid and arms provided to them by the UNITED STATES, SAUDI ARABIA, QATAR and TURKEY under the umbrella of the “FREE SYRIAN ARMY.”10 

Background Information: In June 2011 we wrote:

TUMBLING OF REGIME COULD BE USED BY FUNDAMENTALISTS TO SEIZE POWER
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com/2011/06/assad-dilemma.html

Recently, Conflict Armament Research revealed that weapons ostensibly intended for ‘moderate rebel groups’ found their way to ISIS who disposed of “significant quantities” of US-made small arms including M16 assault rifles. It also reported that anti-tank rockets used by ISIS in SYRIA were identical to M79 rockets transferred by SAUDI ARABIA to forces operating under the FREE SYRIAN ARMY umbrella in 2013. According to Conflict Armament Research, the weapons were either captured or acquired by former FSA fighters as they joined ISIS.11   

Access to arms is not the only manner by which SAUDI ARABIA has helped organizations like ISIS to flourish. In 2007, STUART LEVEY, the Under-Secretary of the US Treasury in charge of monitoring and impeding terror financing said that when it came to al-Qaeda, “if I could somehow snap my fingers and cut off the funding from one country, it would be SAUDI ARABIA.” He also pointed out that not a single person identified by the UNITED STATES or the UNITED NATIONS as funder for terrorism had been prosecuted by the SAUDIS.12 Two years later, Wikileaks revealed that Secretary of State HILLARY CLINTON wrote how "donors in SAUDI ARABIA constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide…SAUDI ARABIA remains a critical financial support base for al-Qa’ida, the Taliban, LeT [Lashkar-e-Taiba in PAKISTAN] and other terrorists groups.” CLINTON also pointed out that when SAUDI ARABIA engaged in that rare act against al-Qaeda, it was as a domestic threat and not against its activities abroad.13

To this day, there has been no stem to the flow of terrorist financing despite the fact that in SAUDI ARABIA, as well as in other GULF countries, it is difficult for citizens to provide funds to foreign Islamic causes without government approval. As recently as June, 2014, U.S. Treasury Secretary JACOB J. 

LEW said that fighting terror financing from the GULF remains an uphill battle. Moreover, “even small amounts of money that get through have a very substantial impact.”  For example, it is estimated that the cost of keeping a fighter in the field in YEMEN and SYRIA is only between $10 to $50 dollars a day. According to THEODORE KARASIK, “terrorist labor expenses are low…Fighters with ISIL and in YEMEN aren’t in it for the money. They have a cause, and religious fervor. Plus, the ability to garner battlefield experience is invaluable.”14 

SAUDI ARABIA HAS BEEN THE OFFICIAL SPONSOR OF SUNNI SALAFISM [ANOTHER TERM FOR WAHHABISM] ACROSS THE GLOBE

This ‘religious fervor’ that converts young men from all over the world into suicide bombers, oppressors and mass murderers has long been sponsored by SAUDI ARABIA, who have thus far spent over hundreds of billions on radical madrassas and mosques where impressionable Muslims are indoctrinated into WAHHABI jihad.15 Churning out a steady supply of enemies to the UNITED STATES, ED HUSAIN, a former Islamist activist, explains:   

“Over more than two decades, SAUDI ARABIA has lavished around $100 billion or more on the worldwide promotion of the violent, intolerant and crudely puritanical WAHHABIST sect of Islam that the ruling royal family espouses… Al Qaeda, the Islamic State in IRAQ and SYRIA, Boko Haram, the Shabab and others are all violent Sunni Salafi groupings…For five decades, SAUDI ARABIA has been the official sponsor of Sunni Salafism [another term for Wahhabism] across the globe.”  

Background Information: 

SAUDI ARABIA - NERVE CENTER OF ISLAMIC EXTREMISM
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/08/saudi-arabia-origin-of-wahhabism.html

SAUDI ARABIA: ARMING THE SYRIAN REBELS IS AN EXCELLENT IDEA
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com/2012/08/saudi-arabias-proxy-war.html

These Salafist groups, according to Husain, “have been lavishly supported by the SAUDI government, which has appointed emissaries to its embassies in Muslim countries who proselytize for Salafism.”16 Of course, the most famous group of Salafis are the nineteen hijackers of 9/11, fifteen of whom were SAUDI ARABIAN citizens. In the opinion of Senator BOB GRAHAM, the co-chairman of the official 9/11 inquiry and former chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, “the failure to shine a full light on SAUDI actions and particularly its involvement in 9/11 has contributed to the SAUDI ability to continue to engage in actions that are damaging to the US – and in particular their support for Isis.” Commenting on BUSH’S role in keeping information regarding SAUDI complicity secret, Senator BOB GRAHAM illustrates the self- defeating nature of U.S. alliances today: “It’s as if the President’s loyalty lay more with SAUDI ARABIA than with AMERICA’S safety.”17 Following the tradition of his predecessor, President OBAMA has yet to publish the redacted twenty-eight pages of the 9/11 Commission Report that allegedly implicate SAUDI involvement in 911 –despite promising to do so in his re-election campaign.18  

KUWAIT
  

Since the first GULF War, Salafists have enjoyed a strong foothold in KUWAIT, which is now described as a WESTERN UNION outlet for SYRIAN mujahideen.  According to ZOLTAN PALL:  

‘In the past two decades the different KUWAITI Salafi groups have been among the most important bankrollers of the Salafi movement worldwide. KUWAITI Salafi charities and individual donors are financing the building and maintenance of thousands of Salafi mosques and other institutions worldwide. The reach of KUWAITI Salafi groups increased after the Arab Spring, when they became prominent among the main sponsors of the SYRIAN rebel groups.”19  

Without mincing his words, DAVID S. COHEN, the Treasury Under Secretary for terrorism and financial intelligence points out, “our ally KUWAIT has become the epicentre for fundraising for terrorist groups in SYRIA” and that “the KUWAITIS could be doing a lot more on this issue.”20 

KUWAIT HAS EMERGED AS A FINANCING AND ORGANIZATIONAL HUB FOR CHARITIES AND INDIVIDUALS SUPPORTING SYRIA’S MYRIAD REBEL GROUPS

COHEN also says that KUWAIT posed the region’s biggest problem of financing linked to mujahideen in SYRIA while AMERICAN pressure on KUWAIT remained largely fruitless.21 ANDREW TABLER, senior fellow at the WASHINGTON Institute for Near East Policy conceded, ‘Everybody knows the money is going through KUWAIT and that it’s coming from the ARAB Gulf...KUWAIT’S banking system and its money changers have long been a huge problem because they are a major conduit for money to extremist groups in SYRIA and now IRAQ.”22 A report by Brookings asserts that: “Over the last two and a half years, KUWAIT has emerged as a financing and organizational hub for charities and individuals supporting SYRIA’S myriad rebel groups… Today, there is evidence that KUWAITI donors have backed rebels who have committed atrocities and who are either directly linked to al-Qaeda or cooperate with its affiliated brigades on the ground.”23 GHANIM AL-MTEIRI, a former soldier in the KUWAITI Army and a fundraiser for the al-Nusra Front, explains his stance like this: “Once upon a time we cooperated with the AMERICANS in IRAQ… Now we want to get BASHAR out of SYRIA, so why not cooperate with Al Qaeda?”24 By the dint of KUWAITI inaction, it appears that the government shares this mentality as well.   

QATAR   

“That's essentially what QATAR has long offered its friends: a platform, with access to money, media, and political capital. WASHINGTON has so far played along, but the question is whether the UNITED STATES is actually getting played.”  

- Elizabeth Dickinson on QATAR’S relationship with its jihadi friends.25   

If ISIS is SAUDI ARABIA’S “project,” Jabhat al Nusra/al Qaeda is QATAR’S own investment in what is a double-pronged attack from the GULF against SYRIA on their road to IRAN. DAVID COHEN, the U.S. Treasury Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence describes QATAR as a “permissive jurisdiction” for donors funding foreign jihadi fighters in SYRIA.26 According to a senior QATARI official, QATAR’S military and financial largesse towards Jabhat al-Nusra is so integral that he says he can identify al-Nusra commanders simply by the blocks they control in various SYRIAN cities.27 DANIEL BYMAN, of the Brookings Institute points out: 

“It’s often individual Qataris, some with government links, who are providing the funding for jihadists. But that doesn’t mean you can absolve the government…They have not put significant barriers in the way of this kind of thing – and a lot of people believe the government has, in fact, allowed it to happen.”28 

To illustrate, QATAR has also played a game of  “Catch and Release” with individuals wanted by their allies for involvement in terrorism. For example, in a GUARDIAN article titled “How QATAR is Funding the Rise of Islamist Extremists,” it was revealed that Ibrahim al-Bakr, a 37 year old QATARI identified by the US treasury as a key link between al-Qaeda’s leadership in PAKISTAN and GULF financiers, was briefly jailed “for his involvement in a jihadist network” only to be released after he promised “not to conduct terrorist activity in QATAR.” 

QATAR COMPETING WITH SAUDI ARABIA FOR REGIONAL INFLUENCE, YET UNITED IN ITS ANTI-SHIA GOALS

Upon his release, al-Bakr promptly joined a cell that planned to attack US military bases in QATAR.29 On August 20, QATAR’S barely veiled support for terrorist groups finally led the GERMAN Development Minister GERD MUELLER to openly accuse QATAR of financing the Islamic State militants: "This kind of conflict, this kind of a crisis always has a history ... The ISIS troops, the weapons - these are lost sons, with some of them from IRAQ...You have to ask who is arming, who is financing ISIS troops. The keyword there is QATAR - and how do we deal with these people and states politically?"30  

ISLAM VERSUS CHRISTIANS
SYRIA - SUNNI MONARCHIES VERSUS SHIITES AND ALAWITES?
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com/2011/12/food-for-though.html

Competing with SAUDI ARABIA for regional influence yet united in its anti-Shia goals, for years, QATAR has supported Islamist groups around the region by providing safe haven, diplomatic mediation, financial aid and even weapons.31 Aside from LIBYA and SYRIA, QATAR’S network of proxy militaries also includes Taliban insurgents, SOMALI Islamists, and SUDANESE rebels.32  Due to the stage managing of foreign terrorists by GULF countries, LIBYA, like IRAQ before it and SYRIA today, are three countries that have transformed from viable states with considerable women’s rights to becoming the ‘Woodstock of terrorist scumbags.’33 Even AQIM  and Boko Haram34 acquired weapons from  LIBYA,35 where mujahideen were likewise empowered by the GULF axis to wage war against the LIBYAN state until it is destroyed,36 leaving a vacuum for more Islamist fighters and further foreign military intervention from the GULF and other countries.37 

It was these very same mujahideen who assassinated Ambassador CHRIS STEVENS, who may or may not have been smuggling weapons from LIBYA to rebels in SYRIA.38  Despite QATAR’S foreign policy of funding enemies of the UNITED STATES and visiting destruction on nations via their proxies, the State Department describes  QATAR as "a valuable partner to the UNITED STATES" and plays a positive and "influential role in the region through a period of great transformation. Together, we support progress, stability and prosperity in the region."39 In light of QATAR’S sponsorship of extremist groups, such a KAFKAESQUE assessment of the AMERICAN-QATARI alliance by the State Department itself points to a flawed and confused political environment in WASHINGTON.   

TURKEY   - DIRECTLY SUPPORTED JABHAT AL NUSRA

Ignoring the UNITED STATES, TURKEY, a member of NATO, has directly supported Jabhat al Nusra,  promoting it as the most effective force against the SYRIAN government and previously complaining that its designation as a terrorist organization was “premature.’40 Former U.S. ambassador to ANKARA FRANCIS RICCIARDONE told journalists that TURKISH authorities work with Jabhat al-Nusra, an al-Qaeda offshoot, as well as hardline Salafi Islamist groups such as Ahrar al-Sham. MR RICCIARDONE said that the TURKS refused to close their borders to the groups: "We ultimately had no choice but to agree to disagree… The TURKS frankly worked with groups for a period, including al-Nusra, whom we finally designated as [being groups] we're not willing to work with."41 From the beginning of the SYRIAN uprising, TURKEY allowed its borders to be used as a conduit for aid, weapons and volunteers heading to support SYRIAN rebels whose status as "moderate" or extremists had not been distinguished.42 

Background Information:

KURDISH EQUATION
TURKEY’S DREAMS OF BEING ENERGY HUB STRENGTHENED BY PKK NEGOTIATIONS?
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2013/03/turkey-and-kurds.html

KURDISH MARCH TOWARD AUTONOMY GAINS MOMENTUM
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/08/turkeys-syrian-policies.html

TURKEY'S GAMBLE ON KURDISTAN OIL
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/08/turkeys-erratic-foreign-policies-all.html

TURKEY WILL TAKE MILITARY ACTION IF THE SYRIAN KURDS MAKE MOVES TOWARD AUTONOMY & TURKEY – SYRIA - WATER DISPUTE (1989)
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/10/turkeys-foreign-policy-poker-game.html

TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY STANCE 
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com/2013/04/turkeys-changing-foreign-policy-stance.html
WITHOUT THE TURKS,THIS REVOLUTION WOULDN'T HAVE STARTED

Abu Abdallah, a mover and shaker who transports arms, money and humanitarian aid for the SYRIAN rebel explains how AMERICA’S allies can shape AMERICAN foreign policy:  

"‘We reached a point in the fighting, in spring 2012, when we needed proper support. We needed heavy machine guns, real weapons. Money was never an issue: how much do you want? Fifty million dollars, a hundred million dollars – not a problem. But heavy weapons were becoming hard to find: the TURKS – and without them this revolution wouldn’t have started – wanted the AMERICANS to give them the green light before they would allow us to ship the weapons. We had to persuade SAAD AL-HARIRI, RAFIC HARIRI’S son and a former prime minister, to go to put pressure on the SAUDIS, to tell them: “You abandoned the Sunnis of IRAQ and you lost a country to IRAN. If you do the same thing again you won’t only lose SYRIA, but LEBANON with it.”’ The idea was that the SAUDIS in turn would pressure the AMERICANS to give the TURKS the green light to allow proper weapons into the country."43 

ISIS HAS  FOUND A FERTILE RECRUITING GROUND  IN THE SUBURBS OF ISTANBUL

Background Information: 

DIVIDED ENTITIES
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com/2012/07/sunni-versus-shia-middle-easts-new.html

WAHHABI SAUDIS
The MIDDLE EAST is pervaded and increasingly infected by the sectarian rivalry between the SHIITE PERSIANS and the WAHHABI SAUDIS, who are now fighting proxy wars all over the region. 
At: http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/05/turkey-shiite-persians-versus-wahhabi.html

TURKEY AND SYRIA: AN UNDECLARED STATE OF WAR
Sectarianism - “Sunni crescent” 
At: http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/07/turkeys-sunni-crescent.html

Today, ISIS has also found a fertile recruiting ground  in the suburbs of ISTANBUL.44 According to the NEW YORK Times, "one of the biggest source of (ISIS) recruits is neighboring TURKEY" with around 1,000 TURKS having  joined ISIS.45 On September 22, 2014, ERDOGAN also revealed that "six thousand foreign fighters have entered TURKEY" despite being "banned."46  TURKEY, like the UNITED STATES, is not immune from the blowback stoked by their mutual GULF allies and the ill-conceived mimicking of their policies: currently, TURKEY has deployed soldiers on their SYRIAN border in the face ISIS’s rapid advance and will likely join in direct military operations in SYRIA and IRAQ47  

SELF-DEFEATING NATURE OF AMERICAN DECISION- MAKING IN THE MIDDLE EAST

Writing in Foreign Affairs over four decades ago, DAVID FROMKIN, author of A Peace to End All Peace, explains,  

‘Contrary to what appears a widespread misapprehension, there is no outstanding de jure commitment by the UNITED STATES, whether by treaty or otherwise, to go to war in defense of any foreign nation or nations whatsoever. A review of our alliance commitments has shown that we have no legal obligations to defend our allies, but that we do have substantial political and military commitments to friendly nations throughout the world.”48 

The key then, is to determine which nation is friendly and which is not. Needless to say, nations that create, nurture, fund and arm your designated enemies do not qualify as ‘friendly,’ even when making allowances for ‘real politics’ and the constraints of economic necessity. The GULF strategy of allowing ISIS to flourish until a demand arises that something must be done, has proven to be an especially brilliant backdoor for the GULF countries to insert themselves overtly in SYRIA because the airstrikes against ISIS are bound to be ineffective, which will inevitably lead to boots on the ground –mostly AMERICAN boots that is. According to LINA KHATIB, the director of Carnegie MIDDLE EAST Center in BEIRUT notes:  

“Before the coalition's campaign began, ISIS bases in Raqqa and elsewhere were evacuated and the group's members went underground. The raids that have been conducted to date have led to little actual damage to ISIS' military capability, according to one of my informants on the ground there. If anything, they have played right into the hands of its strategy.”49 

SYRIA, ISRAEL, AND TURKEY AND IRAN: A LOVE-HATE QUADRANGLE
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com/2013/05/syria-israel-and-turkey-and-iran-love.html

TAREK FATEH, author of Chasing a Mirage: The Tragic Illusion of an Islamic State concurs: “This was not a coalition that will defeat ISIS; it was a coalition that will end up reinforcing Islamic State as the one true answer to the crimes being committed against the ARAB people by its own leaders.”50 Remarkably, the UNITED STATES also agreed to SAUDI ARABIA’S plan to host training camps for SYRIAN rebels,51 despite the likely consequence of repeating this policy.  Capturing this self-defeating nature of AMERICAN decision- making in the MIDDLE EAST, the US Central Command confirms that the UNITED STATES has already blown up over forty of the Humvees they supplied to the IRAQI military. 

The U.S. Defense Department comments how "in some cases, we have seen instances of ISIL capturing and employing U.S.-made equipment…When we've seen these terrorists employing this equipment, we've sought to eliminate that threat." According to TODD HARRISON, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, the U.S. is sending $30,000-bombs to eliminate these armored vehicles, which each cost approximately $250, 000, depending on what it is equipped with.52  

Speaking to Foreign Policy, JEAN-LOUIS BRUGUIÈRE, the former head of the EU and U.S. Treasury Department's joint Terrorist Finance Tracking Program says, "The U.S. has the tools to monitor state and state-linked transfers to extremist groups. But intelligence is one thing and the other is how you react…What kind of political decision is the U.S. really able to make against states financing terrorism?"53 As vile and deserving as ISIS is of any military action against it, there has been no discussion regarding holding any of its allies accountable for supporting jihadi organizations that the UNITED STATES is now expending its resources fighting against. 

WHY IS THE UNITED STATES IN SYRIA IN THE FIRST PLACE?

Likewise, there has been no discussion regarding the most fundamental of questions: Why is the UNITED STATES in SYRIA in the first place? How and why did it allow itself to be complicit and engaged in this cyclical and perpetual imbroglio in the MIDDLE EAST? What are the long-term consequences and likely outcome of this bombing? Which other countries/groups in the region are better equipped to fight ISIS? In the same spirit, AMERICAN politicians who lobbied for foreign policies that aided and abetted these jihadi organizations as well as cooperation with passive-aggressive allies have thus far escaped any public scrutiny–scrutiny an ordinary AMERICAN citizen would be subject to. 

Background Information: 

EX-CIA CHIEF: ASSAD WIN MAY BE SYRIA'S BEST OPTION
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com/2013/12/syria.html

US MILITARY INTERVENTION
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.co.at/2013/08/us-military-intervention-in-syrian.html

Speaking to CNN, retired general WESLEY CLARK says, "The SAUDIS have for years funded extremism. Their money's all over the region…The SAUDI monarchy has bought billions of dollars' worth of U.S. weapons over the years and funneled them to extremist groups…It can't be exporting extremism and at the same time ask the UNITED STATES to protect it."54   

Witnessing the absurdity and disastrous foreign policy of the UNITED STATES since 9/11, some have attributed these series of failures to the government’s “lacking intelligence and intelligence.”55 This is not entirely accurate or fair. The foreign policy disasters are the result of a larger political system that allows AMERICAN leaders and elite to prioritize the foreign policy objectives of its unfriendly allies over the interests of its own constituents. In this context, the UNITED STATES must review to whom and why it is committed and utilize and act upon their vast intelligence resources in a manner that will serve the interests of their own country rather than the interests of a select group of foreigners and their local representatives. 

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 

TURKEYS ERRATIC FOREIGN POLICIES at:http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/08/turkeys-erratic-foreign-policies-all.html
and
TURKEY WOULD MAKE A SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION TO THE RESOLUTION OF THE SYRIAN CRISIS IF IT COULD BRING ITSELF TO RISE ABOVE THE SECTARIAN CONSIDERATIONS THAT HAVE DICTATED ITS REGIME CHANGE POLICY IN SYRIA at: 
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/08/turkeys-syrian-policies.html

DRAWING SYMPATHY FROM ARAB COUNTRIES at:http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2011/09/turkeys-middle-east-chess-game.html

Endnotes

1  Akbar Shahid Ahmed and Ryan Grim. “ISIS Strikes Deal With Moderate Syrian Rebels: Reports.” The Huffington Post. 12 September 2014.  2  Ben Farmer. “Syria: Nearly Half Rebel Fighters are Jihadists or Hardline Islamists, Says IHS Jane's Report.” The Telegraph. 15 September 2013.  33  Pepe Escobar. “Operation Tomohawk the Caliph” Asia Times. 24 September 2014.  4  Patricia Zengerle  and David Lawder. “U.S. Congress Approves Arming Syrian Rebels, Funding Government.” Reuters. 18 September 2014.  5  Patrick Cockburn. “Iraq crisis: How Saudi Arabia helped Isis take over the north of the country.” The Independent 13 July 2014. See Also: “Maliki: Saudi and Qatar at War Against Iraq.” Al Jazeera. 9 March 2014. See Also: “Iraqi PM Maliki says Saudi, Qatar openly funding violence in Anbar.” Reuters. 9 March 2014. 
6  Seymour Hersh. “The Red Line and the Rat Line.” The London Review of Books. 17 April 2014.  See Also: Patrick Cockburn. “MI6, the CIA and Turkey's rogue game in Syria.”The Independent. 13 April 2014. See Also: As’ad AbuKhalil. “The 8 Proxy Wars Going On in Syria Right Now.” The Huffingtom Post.  24 September 2014.  
7  David Fromkin. “Entagling Alliances.” Foreign Affairs.  July 1970.  8  Steve Clemons. 'Thank God for the Saudis': ISIS, Iraq, and the Lessons of Blowback” The Atlantic. 23 June 2014.  9  Pete Williams. “Rochester Man Mufid A. Elfgeeh Accused of Supporting ISIS Militants.” NBC News.  17 September 2014.  10  Ernesto Londoño and Greg Miller. “CIA Begins Weapons Delivery to Syrian Rebels.” The Washington Post. 11 September, 2013 11  Kevin Boyd. “Remember Those ‘Moderate’ Syrian Rebels That The U.S. Armed? ISIS Got Some of Those Weapons Too.” IJReview. 8 September 2014.   12  Patrick Cockburn. “Al-Qa’ida, the Second Act: Is Saudi Arabia Regretting its Support for Terrorism?” The Independent. 17 March 2014.  13  Declan Walsh. “WikiLeaks Cables Portray Saudi Arabia as a Cash Machine for Terrorists.”The Guardian.  5 December 2010.  14  Glen Carey, Mahmoud Habboush and Gregory Viscusi. “Why ISIS is a Lot Richer than Al-Qaeda”  27  Jun 2014.   15  Michael K. Busch. “WikiLeaks: Saudi Millions Fund Radical Madrassas in Pakistan.” The Daily Kos.  22 May 2011.  See Also: Jonathan Manthorpe.“Jonathan Manthorpe: Saudi Arabia Funding Fuels Jihadist Terror.” The Vancouver Sun. 28 May 2013.  
16   Ed Husain. “Saudis Must Stop Exporting Extremism” The New York Times. 22 August 2014. 17  Patrick Cockburn. “Islamic State: ‘US failure to look into Saudi role in 9/11 has helped Isis.’” The Independent. 14 September 2014.   
18  Lawrence Wright. “The Twenty-Eight Pages.” The New Yorker. 9 September 2014. 19  Zoltan Pall. “Kuwaiti Salafism and its Growing Influence in the Levant.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 7 May 2014.  20  Ben Hubbard. “Private Donors’ Funds Add Wild Card to War in Syria.” The New York Times.  12 November 2013. 21  Ibid.  
                                                                                                                                                                                           22  Josh Rogin. “America's Allies Are Funding ISIS.”The Daily Beast. 14 June 2014 .  23  Elizabeth Dickinson. “Playing with Fire: Why Private Gulf Financing for Syria’s Extremist Rebels Risks Igniting Sectarian Violence at Home.” Analysis Paper No. 16. The Brookings Institution.  December 2013.  24  Ben Hubbard. “Private Donors’ Funds Add Wild Card to War in Syria.” The New York Times.  12 November 2013.  25  Elizabeth Dickinson. “The Case Against Qatar.” Foreign Policy.  30 September 2014   
26  “German Minister Accuses Qatar of Funding Islamic State Fighters.” Reuters. 20 August 2014.  27  Steve Clemons. 'Thank God for the Saudis': ISIS, Iraq, and the Lessons of Blowback.”The Atlantic. 23 June 2014. 28  David Blair and Raf Sanchez. “Senior Isil Commander Raised £1.25 Million from Qatari Nationals, Says US Treasury.” The Telegraph. 26 September 2014.  29  David Blair and Richard Spencer. “How Qatar is Funding the Rise of Islamist Extremists.” The Telegraph. 20 September 2014. 30           “German Minister Accuses Qatar of Funding Islamic State Fighters.” Reuters. 20 August 2014.  31  David Kirkpatrick. “Qatar’s Support of Islamists Alienates Allies Near and Far” The New York Times.  7 September 2014.  32     Elizabeth Dickinson. “The Case Against Qatar.” Foreign Policy. 30 September 2014  33            Eli Lake. “So Many Jihadists Are Flocking to Libya, It's Becoming ‘Scumbag Woodstock.’ The Daily Beast. 6 May 2014.  34  David Wood. “Libyan Weapons Arming Al Qaeda Militias Across North Africa, Officials Say.” The Huffington Post. February 21 2013.  See Also: Freedom C. Onuoha. “Porous Borders and Boko Haram’s Arms Smuggling Operations in Nigeria.” Al Jazeera. 8 September 2013.   
35  James Risen, Mark Mazzetti and Michael S. Schmidt. “U.S. Approved Arms for Libya Rebels Fell into Jihadi Hands” The New York Times. 5 December 2012.  See Also: Aya Burweila. “A Failure of Statesmanship: The UN Gives War, Not Libya, A Chance” China-US Focus. 6 May 2011.   
36  Rania Abouzeid. “Arming Syria’s Rebellion: How Libyan Weapons and Know-How Reach Anti-Assad Fighters.” Time. 29 May, 2013 37  Patrick Kingsley, Chris Stephen and Dan Roberts . “UAE and Egypt Behind Bombing Raids Against Libyan Militias, Say US Officials.” The Guardian. 26 August 2014.  38   Micael B. Kelley. “How US Ambassador Chris Stevens May Have Been Linked To Jihadist Rebels In Syria.”  Business Insider. 19 October 2012.  39  “U.S. Relations with Qatar.” The U.S.Department of State Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs. . 26 August 2014.  40  Semih Idiz. “Turkey Reconsiders Support for Jabhat al-Nusra.”Al Monitor. 13 August 2013.  41  “Our Non Ally in Ankara.” The Wall Street Journal. 15 September 2014. 42  Richard Spencer and Raf Sanchez. “Turkish Government Co-operated with al-Qaeda in Syria, says Former US Ambassador.” The Telegraph. 12 September  2014. 43  Ghaith Abdul-Ahad. “How to Start a Battalion (in Five Easy Lessons)” The London Review of Books. Vol. 35. No. 2. 21 February 2013.    
44  Alev Scott and Alexander Christie-Miller   “Exclusive: ISIS Starts Recruiting in Istanbul’s Vulnerable Suburbs.” Newsweek. 12 September  2014   45  Ceylan Yeginsu. “ISIS Draws a Steady Stream of Recruits From Turkey” The New York Times.  15 September 2014.  46  “Turkish President Erdogan on ISIS and Regional Security” The Council on Foreign Relations.  22 September 2014.   
                                                                                                                                                                                           47  Erin Cunningham and Karen DeYoung. “Turkey, with Islamic State on its doorstep, is expected to authorize troops in Syria, Iraq.” The Washington Post. 30 September 2014.  48  David Fromkin. “Entagling Alliances.” Foreign Affairs.  July 1970. 49  Lina Khatib. “Opinion: Airstrikes Will Not Beat ISIS.” CNN. 26 September 2014.  50   Tarek Fatah. “War Against ISIS Headed for Failure.” The Toronto Sun. 16 September 2014.  51  “Saudi Arabia Agrees to Host Training of Moderate Syria Rebels.” Reuters. 10 September 2014.  52  Cristina Alesci and Kate Trafecant. “One Cost of War: U.S. Blowing up its Own Humvees.”CNN. 25 September 2014.   
53  Elizabeth Dickinson. “The Case Against Qatar.” Foreign Policy. 30 September 2014   
54   Greg Richter. “Gen. Wesley Clark: Saudis, Qatar Created ISIS Threat” Newsmax. 25 August 2014.   
55  Richard Norton-Taylor. “Iraq, Syria, Libya, UK – Intelligence Failures All.” The Guardian. 26 August 2014. See Also: “Expert: ISIS Has the Ability to Hit U.S.”  CNN. 22 August 2014. 

An Israeli couple was shot dead by Palestinian terrorists, their four children rescued under fire

Eitam and Na’ama Henkin, a couple in their 30s, were killed Thursday evening, Oct. 1, when their car was sprayed with bullets as it passed through the West Bank village of Beit Fourik between Itamar and Alon Moreh. Their four young children, who were also in the vehicle, were slightly wounded. The family was from Neria.  Security forces and civilian responders came under heavy Palestinian fire when they tried to reach the car and rescue the children, aged 4 months, 4, 7, and 9.  Fire was returned and continued for some time.  

The attack was a drive-by shooting and the gunmen are believed to have escaped to the Palestinian town of Nablus.

DEBKAfile’s military sources report that he crime was committed by a Palestinian team of two terrorists, one armed with an M-16 automatic rifle, the other with a pistol. They directed a hail of bullets to pentrate the Israeli family car’s windscreen. The two parents were both killed. This attack was deliberately planned. The gunmen waited for the car to slow down just before a curve in the road before they opened fire. They had also prepared their getaway route.

Large army contingents have streamed to the vicinity of the attack, both to search for the killers and to thwart revenge attacks against Palestinians. Drones are hovering overhead.

No Palestinian terrorist organization has taken responsibility for the attack.

TALER – KRYPTOGRAFISCHES BEZAHLSYSTEM

KRYPTOGRAFISCHES BEZAHLSYSTEM "TALER" KÖNNTE TECHNISCH BIS ENDE DES JAHRES FERTIG WERDEN

Rechtliche und betriebliche Fragen noch ungeklärt  -
Peter Mühlbauer Taler-Logo. Grafik: INRIA

"Taler" hat in Deutschland einen guten Klang – nicht zuletzt wegen Erika Fuchs, aber auch wegen des langen internationalen Erfolgs der Münzen, die im Orient bis ins 20. Jahrhundert hinein das einzige allgemein akzeptierte Zahlungsmittel waren und unter anderem als Namensgeber für die heutige Weltwährung US-Dollar fungierten.

"Taler" heißt auch ein kryptografisches Bezahlsystem, das von der Ingolstädter Renewable Freedom Foundation finanziert und vom französischen Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (INRIA), Richard Stallmans GNU-Team und Wissenschaftlern an der TU München entwickelt wird. Der Taler soll – anders als zum Beispiel Bitcoins – keine eigene Währung sein, sondern bei Geschäften über das Internet existierende Währungen wie Dollar und Euro abbilden. Über das so genannte RESTful-Protocol können Taler via HTTP oder HTTPS in existierende Web-Applikationen integriert werden. An der Integration mit dem bestehenden Bankensystem die über das HBCI- und FinTS- Nachfolgerprotokoll EBICS laufen soll, wird ebenfalls noch gearbeitet.

Der neue Taler soll Verbrauchern Anonymität beim Zahlen gewähren, aber Zahlungen rechtssicher beweisbar machen. Damit er diese Anonymität gewähren kann, muss er Eigenschaften von Bargeld aufweisen. Das führt dazu, dass man Wechselgeld benötigt. Hat ein Kunde, der eine Ware für zwei Euro kaufen will, beispielsweise nur eine Talermünze im Wert von fünf Euro, muss er neue Münzen im Wert von 3 Euro erzeugen. Diese Drei-Euro-Münzen können aber danach nicht mehr mit der ursprünglichen Fünf-Euro-Münze in Verbindung gebracht werden. Auf diese Weise schützt ein Verbraucher sich und seine Daten gegenüber großen und kleinen Unternehmen.

UNTERSCHIED ZU BITCOINS – KEINE EIGENE WÄHRUNG

Empfänger von Zahlungen sind dagegen sichtbar, was Behörden grundsätzlich Einsichtnahmen in die Geldflüsse erlaubt, nach denen Umsatz- und Einkommensteuern berechnet und erhoben werden. Anders sieht es bei den Grundlagen für Vermögens- und Erbschaftssteuern aus: Hier kann man einen Rechner mit Talern auf der Festplatte dem Finanzamt verschweigen. Da man das aber mit ererbtem Bargeld ebenfalls machen kann, müssen Staaten vor dem Bezahlsystem (anders als bei Bitcoins) keine Angst vor dem Wegbrechen ihrer Finanzierungsgrundlage haben.

Damit der Taler all das kann, haben sich die Entwickler Protokolle und maschinenlesbare Verträge zwischen drei Interaktionspartnern ausgedacht: Der elektronischen Prägestelle ("Münze" / "Mint"), die das Geld herausgibt, der Geldbörse ("Wallet"), mit der ein Verbraucher zahlt, und dem Händler, der Waren oder Dienstleistungen anbietet. Die Protokolle zwischen Münze und Geldbörse und zwischen Münze und Händler sind weitgehend fertig, das zwischen Händler und Geldbörse noch nicht ganz. Alle Protokolle sind Freie Software und können von jedermann inspiziert und (im Rahmen der GNU-Lizenzen) verwendet werden.

Rein technisch könnte der Taler, von dem es bereits ein offizielle GNU-Paket gibt, Chefentwickler Dr. Christian Grothoff zufolge Ende des Jahres fertig werden. Bei einer Währung, die auch von Behörden akzeptiert werden soll, gibt es aber auch rechtliche und (daraus folgende) betriebliche Hindernisse: Die deutsche Finanzaufsicht verlangt nämlich für solche Geschäfte eine Banklizenz, die nur erteilt wird,wenn man eine Million Euro an Sicherheiten vorlegen kann. Der Taler benötigt also entweder Investoren oder Partner, die bereits im Bankgewerbe tätig sind.

TURKEY – UYGHUR

East Turkestan Islamic Movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org

TURKISH – UYGHUR TERROR INC. – USA’S OTHER AL QAEDA

It is no longer tenable for the United States and its regional allies in and near the Middle East to claim they are backing “moderate rebels” in the proxy war raging in Syria, Iraq, and parts of Lebanon. There is the Syrian government on one side, and terrorists including Al Qaeda and its various franchises such as the Al Nusrah Front and the so-called “Islamic State” (ISIS/ISIL) on the other.

Background Information: 2013 we wrote:

UYGHUR ACTIVISTS ALLEGEDLY LINKED TO AL-QAEDA AND EASTERN TURKISTAN ISLAMIC MOVEMENT http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2013/11/china-and-uyghur.html

If one is not supporting the Syrian government, it is very clear they are supporting Al Qaeda. So obvious is this fact, that the Western press and the corporate-financier think tanks that produce for them their talking points, have begun a campaign to re-brand Al Qaeda as a lesser evil vis-a-vis ISIS. In reality, there is virtually no difference, with the US and its regional allies clearly arming, funding, and supporting both.

The most recent and obscene manifestation of this re-branding was US Army General and former CIA Director David Petraeus’ open calls to use Al Qaeda to “fight” ISIS. In the Daily Beast’s article, “Petraeus: Use Al Qaeda Fighters to Beat ISIS,” it was reported that:

Members of al Qaeda’s branch in Syria have a surprising advocate in the corridors of American power: retired Army general and former CIA Director David Petraeus. 

The former commander of U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan has been quietly urging U.S. officials to consider using so-called moderate members of al Qaeda’s Nusrah Front to fight ISIS in Syria, four sources familiar with the conversations, including one person who spoke to Petraeus directly, told The Daily Beast.

US AND ITS SAUDI ALLIES CREATED AL QAEDA AS A PROXY MERCENARY FORCE TO FIGHT THE SOVIET UNION IN AFGHANISTAN IN THE 1980’s

Within this rhetorical shift we find an admission that there is indeed no “moderate rebel” force to speak of. All that exists, admittedly, are extremists operating under the various banners of Al Qaeda and ISIS.

Revelations of America’s support behind Al Qaeda may not have ever been so overt, but are certainly nothing new. It is admitted that the US and its Saudi allies first created Al Qaeda as a proxy mercenary force to fight the Soviet Union in a proxy war in Afghanistan in the 1980s. In 2007, long before the current war in Syria broke out, it was warned by Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh in the pages of the New Yorker that under the then Bush administration, support already began to flow to the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria and other extremists groups including Al Qaeda for the purpose of violently undermining the Syrian government in Damascus.
Hersh’s article, “The Redirection: Is the Administration’s new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism?” it is explicitly stated:

To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has cooperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.

Past and present, it is clear that Al Qaeda was and still is a central instrument of the United States in achieving geopolitical objectives – particularly where Western forces cannot immediately or in any practical sense intervene directly.

But Al Qaeda and its various affiliates are only one faction among many terrorist groups minding the vast interests of American global hegemony. A recent bombing in the heart of Bangkok, capital of Southeast Asia’s nation of Thailand, and ongoing violence in China’s Xinjiang region expose another vast network of US-sponsored terrorism operating in tandem with Al Qaeda and in fact stretching from Asia all the way to frontiers of America’s proxy war with Syria.

Background Information: 

TURKISH UYGHUR MUSLIM MINORITIES A CAUSE OF CONCERN?  

http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2014/03/china-and-islam-uyghur-muslims.html

TURKEY AND CHINA AT ODDS OVER 10 MILLION TURKISH UYGHUR MINORITIES LIVING IN CHINA 

http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com/2013/10/is-turkey-swerving-eastward.html

TURKISH-UYGHUR TERROR – THE OTHER AL QAEDA 

Because it relatively poorly understood and under-reported in comparison to other more notorious terrorist groups, the Turkish-Uyghur terror network is perhaps more dangerous and of greater utility to the United States and its allies presently versus their increasingly exposed Al Qaeda legions.

The genesis of modern Turkish-sponsored terrorism, like Al Qaeda, also originates from the Cold War. Part of the wider stay-behind networks known as “Gladios” created by Western entities to allegedly fight Soviet forces in the event of a Soviet invasion and occupation of Western Europe, these terrorist groups were instead turned against the population of NATO member states and engaged in violence, terrorism, mass murder, and assassinations. A group of ultra-nationalists known as the “Grey Wolves” would be cultivated for this task within Turkey.

In a 1998 LA Times article titled, “Turkish Dirty War Revealed, but Papal Shooting Still Obscured,” it would be reported that (emphasis added):

In the late 1970s, armed bands of Gray Wolves launched a wave of bomb attacks and shootings that killed hundreds of people, including public officials, journalists, students, lawyers, labor organizers, left-wing activists and ethnic Kurds. During this period, the Gray Wolves operated with encouragement and protection of the Counter-Guerrilla Organization, a section of the Turkish Army’s Special Warfare Department. Working out of the U.S. Military Aid Mission building in Ankara, the Special Warfare Department received funds and training from U.S. advisors to establish “stay behind” squads of civilian irregulars who were set up to engage in acts of sabotage and resistance in the event of a Soviet invasion. Similar Cold War counter-guerrilla units were created in every member state of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. But instead of preparing for foreign enemies, these operatives often set their sights on domestic targets.

Another LA Times piece titled, “Turkey’s Gray Wolves Nip at Heels of Power,” would reveal the extent of the Grey Wolves reign of terror (emphasis added):

At the height of the Cold War, the army used the Gray Wolves as a violent counterweight to Turkish Communists. The party’s coffers swelled with secret contributions from the government.

By the late 1970s, the Gray Wolves had spun out of state control. Their paramilitary wing fought a campaign against leftist rivals that killed nearly 6,000 people. Ali Agca, who shot Pope John Paul II in a 1981 assassination attempt, is alleged to have been affiliated with the party.

The article would also reveal that despite this horrific past, the Grey Wolves and their political allies were still a very potent political force in Turkey. Today, the Grey Wolves function as a paramilitary wing of the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), which holds the third largest number of seats in Turkey’s parliament.

As troubling as this should be to Turks who may find themselves on the receiving end of a politically powerful terrorist organization apparently tolerated, even sponsored by NATO for decades and in particular, supported by the United States, the Grey Wolves’ terrorism has branched out far beyond Turkey’s borders.

NATO STRATEGIES 

According to a 2009 New American Media report titled, “Behind the China Riots — Oil, Terrorism & ‘Grey Wolves’,” Turkey’s Grey Wolves have established militant training camps as far as China’s western Xinjiang region, helping produce violent terrorists who have carried out a series of deadly attacks across China. The report would state (emphasis added):

Enter the Grey Wolves, one of the world’s most notorious terrorist organizations. Founded in the 1960s, the Wolves are a pan-Turkic paramilitary group with 1 million followers across the Near East, Central Asia and inside Xinjiang. During the decade of political violence in Turkey in the 1980s, the military-backed activists launched a wave of assassinations, massacres of ethnic minorities, and extortions of businesses. By official count, the Turkish government holds the Wolves responsible for more than 600 murders, while leftists estimate the victims numbered in the many thousands. 

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Grey Wolves set up training camps in Central Asia for youths from Turkic language groups, including Uighur. Their indoctrination program embraces the goal of establishing Turan, a Turkish empire across Euro-Asia, subjugating non-Turkish races and unleashing violence to achieve their ends. Out of the limelight, the Wolves provided commando training and material support for the East Turkestan Independence Movement.

In essence, NATO’s stay-behind networks had become NATO’s “go-abroad” networks, projecting the same sort of violence, terrorism, and political coercion abroad after the Cold War that these networks carried out domestically during the Cold War.

The alleged “struggle” by the Uyghur people in Xinjiang, referred to by the terrorists and their foreign sponsors as “East Turkistan,” consists of two essential components – a foreign harbored political front including the Washington D.C. and Munich-based World Uyghur Congress (WUC) and a militant front clearly backed by the US and NATO through intermediary groups like Turkey’s Grey Wolves.

Like the Grey Wolves, the World Uyghur Congress is a creation and perpetuation of Western special interests. WUC is directly funded by the US State Department via the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) over a quarter of a million dollars (on record) a year. The NED admittedly organizes and underwrites all of WUC’s events, and their annual meetings usually feature almost exclusively US representatives reaffirming their commitment to support WUC’s objectives which, as stated on their official website, include:

The WUC declares a nonviolent and peaceful opposition movement against Chinese occupation of East Turkestan and an unconditional adherence to the international accepted human rights standard as laid down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and adherence to the principals of democratic pluralism and rejection of totalitarianism, religious intolerance, and terrorism as an instrument of policy.

And while WUC claims to stand for a “peaceful opposition” to resist what it calls “Chinese occupation,” it regularly justifies, defends, or covers up violence. Perhaps the most appalling example of this was when it failed to condemn the 2014 brutal murder of prominent Uyghur imam, 74 year old Jume Tahir, in front of China’s biggest and oldest mosque. WUC would denounce him as a “tool” of the Chinese government and even go as far as denounce China for sentencing his killers – Uyghur terrorists – to death for the horrific murder.

Clearly WUC not only finds it impossible to denounce terrorism, it willfully serves as rhetorical cover for it.

Looking at a map of China it is clear that this campaign of separatism directly serves the long-standing plans of the United States to encircle and contain China’s rise – a campaign that has been openly and repeated outlined in US policy papers for decades – the most recent of which was published by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and was titled, “Revising U.S. Grand Strategy Toward China.” It states in no uncertain terms:

Because the American effort to ‘integrate’ China into the liberal international order has now generated new threats to U.S. primacy in Asia—and could result in a consequential challenge to American power globally—Washington needs a new grand strategy toward China that centers on balancing the rise of Chinese power rather than continuing to assist its ascendancy.

Encouraging separatism in China’s western Xinjiang region, if successful, would carve off a substantial amount of territory. In conjunction with US-backed separatism in China’s Tibet region, an immense buffer region stands to be created that would virtually isolate China from Central Asia. And while the Grey Wolves and their Uyghur proxies are working hard to create this barrier to China’s west, with their involvement in a recent bombing in Bangkok, it appears the US is now using them to augment efforts to create a similar encirclement across Southeast Asia.

NATO EXPANDS INTO SOUTHEAST ASIA

The Turkish-Uyghur terror network, in addition to fomenting violence across China, has more recently been trafficking terrorists from Xinjiang, through Southeast Asia, and onward to Turkey where they are staged, armed, trained, and then sent to fight NATO’s proxy war in Syria. This trafficking network apparently snaked its way through Thailand – exposed when Thailand detained over 100 Uyghurs which it then deported upon Beijing’s request back to China in July.

On the same day the deportations occurred WUC and NATO’s Grey Wolves organized violent protests in Turkey both in Ankara and at the Thai consulate in Istanbul during which the consulate was invaded and destroyed.

A month later, a devastating bomb would detonate in the heart of Bangkok, killing 20 mostly Chinese tourists and injuring over 100 more. In addition to the BBC already being on site before the blast, the British network would conclude even before bodies were cleared from the site that Uyghurs were likely behind the blast. This was done specifically to deflect blame from another US proxy, Thaksin Shinawatra, who has been attempting for years to regain power in Thailand.

In reality, Shinawatra and the Uyghur terrorists are both functions of the same Westesrn agenda to encircle and contain China by building up a “wall” of proxy states around Beijing, and if nothing else, to create chaos in which Beijing finds it nearly impossible to prosper.

What is perhaps most concerning regarding these two Western proxies is the fact that many past bombings associated with Shinawatra’s terrorist networks – networks which are extensive – match the methods used by Turkish-Uyghur terrorists making it likely that NATO’s extraterritorial networks New American Media reported on in 2009 being set up in China, are likely now dotting Uyghur trafficking routes throughout Southeast Asia as well.

The blast in Bangkok likely took place for a number of reasons. Not only did Thailand ignore US demands to release the detained Uyghurs to Turkey, as well as oust a long-cultivated US proxy – Thaksin Shinawatra – but it has been cultivating unmistakably closer ties to Beijing including the signing of major joint-infrastructure development projects, closer military cooperation, and even the potential procurement of 3 Chinese-made submarines – all of which US policymakers have been decrying with increasing indignation.

TURKISH-UYGHUR INFLUENCE BEYOND ASIA

And while the US is using Turkish-Uyghur terror to extort concessions from Southeast Asia and to destabilize China, it is likely that this “other Al Qaeda” will turn up still in other regions – most predictably, Russian Crimea.

Crimea rejoined Russia after a NATO-backed, violent Neo-Nazi coup overthrew the government of Ukraine, creating a cascade of anti-Russian violence across the country. Eager to avoid the fate of many cities across Ukraine, the people of Crimea overwhelmingly voted in a referendum to rejoin Russia. Since then, Crimea has enjoyed peace and prosperity just across the border from a Ukraine now mired in civil war and economic catastrophe, all compounded by an illegitimate regime beholden to the US and NATO who thrust it into power.

The fact that the border between Russian Crimea and Ukraine also represents the border between peace and pandemonium highlights the criminal chaos fostered by US-NATO meddling in Ukraine. A peaceful, stable Crimea serves as a constant reminder to all in Eastern Europe that where ever NATO goes, chaos follows.

If the US and its NATO allies could destabilize Crimea, thus creating chaos within newly repatriated Russian territory, the West could make a compelling case that dealing with Russia is at least as undesirable as dealing with NATO.

US-NATO backed Turkish terrorism would be the key to accomplishing this. Crimea’s proximity to Turkey and a sizable Turkish Tatar minority serves as a potential medium for the West to carry this out. Already the Western media has invested heavily in a narrative centered around “disenfranchised Tatars” and has begun working with opposition groups to stir up confrontations. Like in Xinjiang, those willing to participate in such an opposition constitute a fractional minority – but through the power of Western media, are inflated in the minds of impressionable audiences.

The US State Department’s Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty media outlet in an article deceptively titled, “Putin Warns Crimean Tatars Not To Seek Special Status,” indicated that Russia was well aware of the ruse:

Putin suggested that foreign countries were funding rights activists in an effort to “destabilize the situation” by playing up problems faced by Crimean Tatars, the third-largest ethnic group after Russians and Ukrainians on the peninsula, and said that Moscow would not allow this. 

“You and I know full well who we are talking about. There are a number people who consider themselves professional fighters for rights,” he said, adding that “they want to receive foreign grants and acknowledgement and realize their ambitions, including political ambitions.” 

Already in Kiev, these Tatar opposition fronts have begun organizing and attempting to fan the flames of conflict in Crimea. This includes ATR – a Tatar media channel with opaque funding, now based in Kiev and now what US NED funded “Human Rights in Ukraine” (KhPG) calls fighting “to counter the psychological and propaganda influence from Russia.”

Understanding the scope of Turkish-Uyghur terrorism, their rhetorical supporters, and the function both serve toward maintaining US global hegemony helps disarm the West of its various volatile narratives and criminal conspiracies aimed at creating and leveraging terrorism. If when each bomb goes off, or when any consulate is attacked, the public points the finger not at America’s proxies, but directly at the special interests upon Wall Street and lining Washington instead, all benefits of carrying out a proxy campaign of global terrorism to begin with will evaporate before the West.

As is already happening in Syria where Western plans have been frustrated by growing global awareness of the West’s true involvement in the conflict and its role behind groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS, by exposing their “other Al Qaeda,” their plans elsewhere around the globe will likewise be confounded.

And while the US has attempted for years to galvanize the world behind its global agenda through the use of terrorism, it is ironic that now China, Russia, and even nations like Thailand all now find themselves on common ground, having reason to cooperate closer together in facing a common threat – America’s global terror enterprise.

Written by Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine“New Eastern Outlook”.