Thursday 6 February 2014

Don't Cry for ME-Argentina



I wish I had a nickel for every prediction of social unrest in China that I've read in the past year. Apart from the risk of stampedes at shopping malls before the Lunar New Year, China is tranquil. Meanwhile there are several dozen dead in Cairo overnight, central Bangkok remains under lockdown, street protests are out of control in Ukraine, Argentines are looting stores during power outages, and the stink of tear gas still overhangs the public squares of Istanbul from last year's demonstrations. 

There is social unrest in a lot of places other than China, and it goes together with the collapse of local currencies. The Chinese aren't rioting because they are gainfully occupied and their wages are rising 15% to 20% a year. Other so-called emerging markets are in trouble because they are teeming with people who have nothing remunerative to do. 

Most of the world's people farm for a living, but we need perhaps 1% of the world's population to grow crops at American standards of productivity. The rest are marking time. We will need less unskilled factory labor as automation takes hold, which implies dire consequences for most of the farmers who managed to get to a city and get an entry-level factory job. 

Turkey was supposed to be the poster-boy for prosperity through Muslim democracy. Instead, it has become an object lesson in emerging market mediocrity, and its currency is collapsing because it pretended to be something better than that. 

The Turks can spin polyester into sweaters for the Russian market, build washing machines for Southern Europe, and assemble cars for the Koreans. They can't build a smart phone, let alone a modern aircraft, although their military has put some down-drones in the air. There are a handful of fine universities that produce good engineers and financial types, but not enough to make a dent in the country's overall economic backwardness. 

Turkish Stock Market ETF, Past 12 Months


Turkish Lira to US Dollar


Argentine Peso to US Dollar


Turkey is in trouble because the Turks aren't very good at anything in particular, but acted as if they were the next China. They borrowed vast sums from the international market against a glorious future that was never to be. Among all of the world's big economies Turkey has the worst current account deficit, at nearly 8% of economic output, roughly where Greece was before its national bankruptcy. Investors reckoned that with high economic growth, Turkey would have no problem carrying its debt; what they did not take into account is that the growth itself was largely an illusion, a carnival of consumption and construction that depended on increasing debt in the first place. 

Of all the so-called emerging markets only China addressed the problem of a sidelined population, by methods that appear cruel, even repugnant in Western eyes. The one-child policy, surely the worst intrusion by any state into personal life in modern history, stopped the growth of the peasant population. 

By main force, China will move 700 million people - the equivalent of all Europe from the Urals to the Atlantic - to cities from the countryside within little more than a single generation. This great migration has great costs - separation of families, arbitrary removal of farmers from their land, and the occasional construction of a city in the wrong place. But Chinese household income has risen 16-fold since 1987 as a result. And the Chinese by and large do not riot because they are too busy working. There is no reserve of idle farmers to bus into the center of the capital for a few dollars a day apiece, as in Thailand. 

Unrest, to be sure, has different proximate causes in different places. The Ukrainians want to join the European Community so that they can leave Ukraine and go to places where they can earn money. The Turks object to the ruling party's stealth construction of an Islamic dictatorship with its attendant cronyism and corruption. But the common thread in all the financial and social crises which broke out during the past several months is this: the world economy has left behind large parts of the world's people. 

The Egyptians, with 40% illiteracy and a more than 90% rate of female genital mutilation, dependent on imports for half their food while 70% of the population languishes in rural poverty, are the worst off. The Turks have a future, but it is a humbler and poorer one than their leaders have promised them. The adjustment of expectations will be wrenching, perhaps violent. 

Argentina, whose currency collapsed last week, is another case in point. Blessed with great natural wealth, the Argentines have resented the oligopolies who control their resources, and try to vote themselves rich with depressing regularity. One government after another offers handouts to the querulous voters, who have learned that this practice breeds inflation and currency devaluation. The Argentine game is to be first in line at the public trough, and first in line at the foreign exchange counter to get out of local currency before it collapses yet again. 

The industrial countries have the same kind of problem just below the surface. In America, fewer than half of adults available to work with a high school education or less actually are working. 

US Labor Force - High-School Graduates


That is, only 58% of the noninstitutional adult civilian population with only a high school degree is counted in the labor force. For adults with less than a high school diploma, the labor participation rate falls to just 44%. Deduct the unemployed, and the result is that less than half of Americans without college are at work. That's why 60 million Americans are on food stamps, and why a third of all American households have at least one member receiving means-tested government subsidies. 

Meanwhile employers report shortages of skilled labor in numerous fields. It is hard to find skilled machine operators, who require the equivalent of a couple of years of college math to master the computer controls on industrial equipment, for example. 

Spain's unemployment rate remains at 26%. Spanish workers are now willing to take jobs at 700 euros (US$957) a month making clothing to compete with Chinese imports. That's roughly what better-qualified Chinese workers earn with overtime. The low end of the European labor market, that is, already has converged with the high end of the Chinese labor market. 

US Labor Force - High-School Dropouts


The risk is that the unproductive, unskilled and unemployable portions of the industrial world's people will decide to vote themselves rich. Their leaders encourage this by focusing on income inequality. That is President Obama's message as well as the consensus at the World Economic Forum last week at Davos, and it is nonsense. 

The problem isn't inequality of income, but inequality of knowledge. One pilot flying a modern military aircraft could destroy the whole of an ancient civilization. One farmer from Nebraska can replace a hundred in Egypt. A thousand years ago, everyone knew how a watermill worked; 200 years ago, most people knew how a steam engine works; how many people today know how a computer works? 

East Asia is faring better than the rest of the world in this great transformation because its culture imposes a merciless meritocracy. The West should be able to do better than this. If we can't, we can see our future in Argentina. 

 by David P Goldman

2 comments:

  1. Hi Roy,

    I will address first some misunderstandings from the Argentine situation and finally Mr Goldman's political shortsights.

    Concerning his description of Argentina

    1) The current Argentine government is following a "nationalist" policy, prioritizing employment and industrialization over financial speculation. Most of government-backing economists praise FDR and his New Deal, often refering to the JM Keynes ideas for redressing the economy. That is, Argentina is doing mostly what FDR did to save the US from the Great Depression, and what detrmined after all (along with WW2) that the US became a superpower.

    2) The Argentine Peso didn't collapse last week. It took certainly a plunge from 6.50 ARS/USD to 8.00 ARS/USD, that's a 23% devaluation. Given that the Kirchner government installed a controlled devaluation since 2003 (when the USD did worth 3 ARS), reducing it a few dimes per month, a sudden 23% may be considered a big change, but far from a collapse, unless that those describing the collapse really desire the collapse of the current government to happen, preferably with its swift dismissal.

    As in many economies, the Argentine one has several sectors with conflicting interests. Those in the highly-concentrated crops export sector always desire as much Peso devaluation as possible, in order to maximize the value of their profits (which are traded in USD). Those depending on the domestic consumption don't want to see the average salary plummet, since their sales would be reduced while the import expenditures will skyrocket (imported machinery and spare aprts, energy expenditures, etc.).

    So during the last 4 months most of the export oriented actors (agricultural producers and gran exporters) decided to lockout stopping their export operations, in order to force the government to devalue the currency following a lack of hard currency to pay for energy and spare parts imports, debt payments and turism Dollars to travelers abroad. Given the cultural attachment of the average middle-class Argentinian to the USD as a reserve value, the pressure from the markets forced the government to burn foreign reserves in the Central Bank in order to keep the USD/ARS parity on check. All of that under a mass-media war over amplifying the government problems while the economy continued ruling as usual.

    Since at the same time Brazil was also devaluating its currency (hurting Argentine exports) and since many regional producers found the 6.5 USD/ARS exchange rate too low for reviving exports, the government took advantage of letting the USD increase to cope with many industrial producers requests while at the same time reopening the sale of USD bills to the public, all of that while preserving as much as possible the salary pruchase power.

    (continues)

    ReplyDelete
  2. 3) One of the main ideas of the current government is to transfer wealth from the highly productive primary sector (but a low employment generator) to the industrial and domestic commercial sectors (the most important employer and the one that could help diversify and add value to the national production). Their goal is to make industries and retail thrive by boosting investments and easing the access to credit, with the long term sight of making industrial exports the core of the Argentine exports.

    Crops producers would rather choose to have the lowest tax as possible and to be allowed to transfer their money abroad. That creates a conflict between those producers/exporters and the government. Since most of the population and ordinary citizens prefer a growing, high employment economy, the government tilts towars these goals by taking a part of the crops revenues by means of export taxes and keeping th eUSD under control. Since most of these revenues come from natural advantages of the land, it may be considered fair to heavily tax those crops exports. Farmers (who receive generous subsidies from the government while making a LOT of money) accuse the populace of free-riders, while a significant part of the populace tke the farmers as abusive troublemakers and free riders too. Mr Goldman, apparently being sympathetic to the farmers, thus wrote "the Argentine voters vote themselves rich", bus as you can see that's disputable.

    As of Mr. Goldman's shortsights:

    Knowledge is certainly a very important aspect of modern societies, and key to make succesful high value added goods. However, what really makes a society thrive is its domestic consumption. Without a reasonable good standard of living, no society can build a sustainable future. 16% of Germany workers earn less that the minimum to support themselves despite living in the second most important export country. A collapse of the EU would mean an instant collapse of Germany, while a country like Argentina wouldn't collapse if Brazil goes belly-up (although it will really hurt). So praying to the Godess of Productivity and Knowledge can only yield some advantages but it doesn't solve the basic conundrums that current societies face.

    Otherwise said, even if the Americans imitated Germans and Chinese, if 0.7% of the US population continues to hold 40% or more of the national wealth, and if this trend aggravates, then the ordinary consumer will have less and less money available to buy non-essential goods, so no technological miracle will help to boost companies sales given that decreased mass of available revenues to spend in new products.

    Thanks,

    Andres

    ReplyDelete