THE LEAGUE OF
ARAB STATES OBSERVER MISSION TO SYRIA MISSION REPORT
The Mission report confirms what I have been arguing all along: that the
situation in SYRIA is not the way it is portrayed by mainstream media and
certain WESTERN governments.
Could the real reason for the withdrawal of the LEAGUE OF ARAB STATES
OBSERVER MISSION TO SYRIA was not because of violence but the fact that the
content of the report did not fit into the agenda of certain WESTERN POWERS who
envision a different outcome for SYRIA?
It seems that mainstream media, under the influence of the world power
brokers deliberately “downplay” the content of the report because the results
of the findings would in most likelihood change public opinion, something the
power elite does not want.
Here are some
extracts to that effect:
In Homs
and Dera‘a, the Mission observed armed groups committing acts of violence
against
Government forces, resulting in death and
injury among their ranks. In certain situations, Government forces responded to
attacks against their personnel with force. The observers noted that some of the armed groups were using flares and
armour-piercing projectiles
In Homs, Idlib and Hama,
the Observer Mission witnessed acts of
violence being committed against Government forces and civilians that resulted
in several deaths and injuries. Examples of those acts include the bombing
of a civilian bus, killing eight persons and injuring others, including women
and children, and the bombing of a train carrying diesel oil. In another
incident in Homs, a police bus was blown up, killing two police officers. A
fuel pipeline and some small bridges were also bombed.
The Mission noted that many
parties falsely reported that explosions or violence had occurred in several
locations. When the observers went
to those locations, they found that those reports were unfounded.
The Mission also noted that, according to its teams in the field, the media exaggerated the nature of the incidents and the number of persons killed in incidents and protests in certain towns.
The Mission also noted that, according to its teams in the field, the media exaggerated the nature of the incidents and the number of persons killed in incidents and protests in certain towns.
According to their latest reports and their briefings to the Head
of the Mission on 17 January 2012 in preparation for this report, group team
leaders witnessed peaceful demonstrations by both Government supporters and the
opposition in several places. None of those demonstrations were disrupted,
except for some minor clashes with the Mission and between loyalists and
opposition. These have not resulted in fatalities since the last presentation
before the Arab Ministerial Committee on the Situation in Syria at its meeting
of 8 January 2012.
Since it began its work, the
Mission has been the target of a vicious media campaign. Some media outlets
have published unfounded statements, which they attributed to the Head of the
Mission.
They have also
grossly exaggerated events, thereby distorting the truth.
Such contrived reports have helped to increase tensions among the Syrian people and undermined the observers’ work. Some media organizations were exploited in order to defame the Mission and its Head and cause the Mission to fail.
Such contrived reports have helped to increase tensions among the Syrian people and undermined the observers’ work. Some media organizations were exploited in order to defame the Mission and its Head and cause the Mission to fail.
The Mission received reports from parties
outside Syria indicating that the number of detainees was16,237. It also
received information from the opposition inside the country that the number of
detainees was 12,005. In validating those figures, the teams in the field
discovered that there were discrepancies
between the lists that information was missing and inaccurate, and that names
were repeated. The Mission is communicating with the concerned Government
agencies to confirm those numbers
The Mission noted that the Government
strived to help it succeed in its task and remove any barriers that might stand
in its way. The Government also facilitated meetings with all parties. No
restrictions were placed on the movement of the Mission and its ability to
interview Syrian citizens, both those who opposed the Government and those
loyal to it.
Arab and foreign audiences of certain
media organizations have questioned the Mission’s credibility because those
organizations use the media to distort the facts. It will be difficult to
overcome this problem unless there is political and media support for the
Mission and its mandate. It is only natural that some negative incidents should
occur as it conducts its activities because such incidents occur as a matter of
course in similar missions.
Last
but not least the statement below reiterates what I have claimed regarding
communication restrictions in Syria. See: http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com/2012/02/syrian-agenda.html
The Mission communicates with the various
groups by mobile phones and facsimile machines
connected to the local Syrian telephone
network. Occasional cuts in service
prevent the Mission from communicating with the groups. Internet service is
unavailable in some regions, and in other areas it is intermittent, including
in the capital.
The
full report can be viewed under:
To
reiterate my views, here is an interesting article on subject matter from a
German Middle East Expert: Professor Günther Meyer :
Syrien: Orientexperte erhebt schwere Vorwürfe gegen den Westen
Als
vor wenigen Tagen die Beobachtermission der Arabischen Liga in Syrien gestoppt
wurde, war die Sachlage in den Medien klar: Assad hat die Gewalt nicht beendet, das Morden Unschuldiger geht
weiter. Unterdessen liefert die in London ansässige Syrische Beobachtungsstelle
für Menschenrechte Informationen über die genaue Situation und die Zahl der
Toten. Überprüfbar sind die
Informationen natürlich nicht, dennoch werden sie unkritisch von allen Medien
zitiert.
Nun
hat der Orientexperte Prof. Dr Günther Meyer von der Universität Mainz
in einem Interview des Radiosenders Bayern 2 eine ganz andere Wahrheit
verbreitet. Die Frage, ob die Beobachtermission gescheitert sei, verneint er
klar. So sei die Zahl der Toten deutlich gesunken, sehr viele Gefangene seien
freigelassen worden und überhaupt würden die westlichen Medien das völlig
falsche Bild vermitteln, dass es sich einzig um Gewalt des Regimes gegen
friedliche Demonstranten handeln würde. Meyer schildert eine völlig andere
Sachlage:
Es
ist ganz offensichtlich, dass wir es mit einer bewaffneten terroristischen Organisation zu tun haben, die für
einen sehr großen Teil der Toten im Lande ebenfalls verantwortlich ist. Das ist
durchaus auch in dieser Situation herausgekommen. Das heißt, wir haben eine klare Anti-Sichtweise gegen das Regime, eine
Sichtweise, die massiv gestärkt wird durch die Interessen insbesondere der USA,
aber auch durch die westlichen Verbündeten England, Frankreich, nicht zuletzt
auch Deutschland. Es geht in erster Linie darum, die Achse Iran, Syrien,
Hisbollah auszuschalten.
Der
Radiomoderator fragt irritiert, es klinge „fast wie eine westliche Verschwörung
gegen Syrien“. Meyer erhebt daraufhin schwere Vorwürfe gegen den Westen, der in
Syrien einen Bürgerkrieg entfachen würde:
Wir
haben es mit einem massiven Eingreifen von außen zu tun. Nicht zuletzt Berichte
darüber, dass etwa 600 Mudschaheddin aus Libyen eingeflogen sind, initiiert vom
CIA. CIA-Beamte, Geheimdienstbeamte, Frankreich und Großbritannien genauso,
bilden Oppositionelle aus, rüsten sie aus in der Nähe von Iskenderia, nahe der
syrischen Grenze, rüsten sie aus mit den Waffen, die aus den Arsenalen von
Gaddafi herübergebracht werden, um hier einen Bürgerkrieg zu initiieren, um das
Land insgesamt zu schwächen.
Auch
betont Meyer, dass Assad nach wie vor die Mehrheit des syrischen Volkes hinter
sich hat, wie eine Untersuchung der Katar-Stiftung ergeben habe. Dieses kurze
Radiointerview präsentiert die Situation in Syrien völlig anders, als wir es
seit Monaten in den Medien zu hören bekommen. Wie schon beim Libyeneinsatz handelt es sich auch hier aller
Wahrscheinlichkeit nach um geostrategische Maßnahmen des Westens, die durch
massive Propaganda verheimlicht werden.
Sollten Meyers Vorwürfe stimmen und
tatsächlich durch westliche Geheimdienstaktivitäten ein Bürgerkrieg ausgelöst
werden, dann wäre Assad kaum vorzuwerfen, dass er diesen von außen initiierten
Umsturzversuch mit Militärgewalt niederschlägt. Die Leidtragenden sind die
Zivilisten.
No comments:
Post a Comment