CHINA AND THE MIDDLE EAST

A PAX SINICA IN THE MIDDLE EAST?

By Dr. Kang Wu

Source:  esi.nus.edu. sg

English-language media completely ignored a noteworthy statement that led Der Spiegel‘s GERMAN-language website October 12, a call for CHINA to “take on responsibility as a world power” in the MIDDLE EAST. Penned by Bernhard Zand, the GERMAN news organization’s Beijing correspondent, it is terse and to the point: now that CHINA imports more oil from the MIDDLE EAST than any other country in the world, it must answer for the region’s security. “AMERICA’S interest in the MIDDLE EAST diminishes day by day” as it heads towards energy self-sufficiency, wrote Zand, adding:

CHINA’S interest in a peaceful MIDDLE EAST is enormous, by contrast. Beijing is not only the biggest customer of precisely those oil powers who presently are fanning the flames of conflict in SYRIA; as a VIP customer, Beijing has growing political influence, which it should use openly. The word of the CHINESE foreign minister has just as much weight in Tehran and Riyadh as that of his AMERICAN counterpart.

AMERICA’S BUDGET DEFICIT

CHINA’S situation, Zand continues, is rather like GERMANY’S after reunification: a state whose economic power is growing will eventually be asked what it puts on the table politically. He concludes:

The time when AMERICAN could be counted on to secure Beijing’s supply lines soon will come to an end — AMERICA’S budget deficit will take care of that by itself. Whoever wants to be a world power must take on responsibilities.

I have no idea how CHINA envisions its future role in the MIDDLE EAST. AMERICANS will learn the intentions of the powers who gradually fill the vacuum left by Washington’s withdrawal from the world “well after the fact, if ever”. It is helpful, though, to take note of what the rest of the world is saying, particularly when not a single ENGLISH-language source made reference to it. Der Spiegel’s public call for CHINA to assume a leading geopolitical role in the MIDDLE EAST, though, did not appear out of context.

CHINA’S INTERESTS IN THE LANDS BETWEEN THE HIMALAYAS AND THE MEDITERRANEAN

AMERICAN commentators have regarded CHINA as a spoiler, the source of PAKISTAN’S nuclear weapons technology, IRAN’S ballistic missiles, and other alarming instances of proliferation. It is worth considering a radically different view of CHINA’S interests in the lands between the Himalayas and the Mediterranean: no world power has more to lose from instability than does CHINA.

IRAN’S nuclear weapons program poses the greatest risk to the region, and CHINA has been viewed as uncooperative in the extreme by WESTERN diplomats trying to tighten the economic screws on Tehran. CHINESE companies, moreover, have helped IRAN bypass trade sanctions, but at great cost, and with a complex result. The New York Times on September 30 profiled the problems of IRAN’S economy under the sanctions, and took note of the country’s dependence on CHINA:

One economist, Mohammad Sadegh Jahansefat, said the government had been taken hostage by countries benefiting from the sanctions – particularly CHINA, which he called the worst business partner IRAN had ever had.

“CHINA has monopolized our trade — we are subsidizing their goods, which we are forced to import,” he said, adding of its work in the energy industry, “They destroy local production and leave oil and gas projects unfinished so that no one can work with them.”

PAKISTAN A FORCE TO RECKON WITH?

CHINA’S capacity to exert pressure on the IRANIAN regime is considerable. Apart from its interest in avoiding nuclear proliferation in the PERSIAN GULF, CHINA has a number of points of conflict with IRAN. The one that should keep Tehran on its toes is the Islamic Republic’s border with PAKISTAN. IRAN announced that it had hanged 16 alleged Sunni rebels in Baluchistan province on the PAKISTANI border, the latest in a long series of violent incidents.

“With a population of 170 million, PAKISTAN has 20 million men of military age, as many as IRAN and TURKEY combined; by 2035 it will have half again as many. It also has nuclear weapons.

IRAN SITS BETWEEN TWO SUNNI POWERS -TURKEY AND PAKISTAN

– that depend to a great extent on SAUDI financing, and that also have excellent relations with CHINA. TURKEY’S still-disputed agreement to buy a CHINESE air defense system represented a revolution in CHINESE-TURKISH relations, motivated by a CHINESE promise to transfer the whole package of relevant technology to TURKEY and to help the TURKS to manufacture the systems, a more generous offer than ever Ankara got from the West. TURKEY is the logical terminus for the “New Silk Road” of road, rail, pipelines and broadband that CHINA has proposed to build in CENTRAL ASIA.

CHINA, it might be added, also has excellent relations with ISRAEL, whose premier technical university just was offered a US$130 million grant from Hong Kong magnate Li Ka-shing to fund part of the costs of building a branch in CHINA. CHINESE provincial and local governments will contribute another $147 million. The seamless interchange of ideas and personnel between ISRAEL’S military, universities and tech entrepreneurs is a success story in miniature that CHINA hopes to reproduce in scale. As SINGAPORE-based political scientist Michael Raska reports, CHINA’S military modernization envisions the spread of dual-use technologies to private industry.

Background Information:

RED SEA AND MEDITERRANEAN GAS TRANSFER LINK ENHANCES CHINA'S EXPORT TO SOUTHERN EUROPE AND THE BALKANS 

http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/05/china-and-israel-enter-dragon.html

CHINA’S LAND BRIDGE TO TURKEY CREATES NEW EURASIAN GEOPOLITICAL POTENTIALS

http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/05/china-and-turkey.html

Without attributing any geopolitical intention to Beijing, the visible facts make clear that CHINA has the capacity to exercise strategic influence in the MIDDLE EAST, and it has an unambiguous interest in maintaining stability. What CHINA might choose to do, Washington will learn after the fact, if ever. If CHINA wished to influence IRAN, for example, it has considerable means to do so, and a great deal else besides.