PANETTA, DEMPSEY CLEAR PENTAGON DESK OF US MILITARY
OPTION FOR SYRIA
Via DEBKAfile
US
ASSESSMENT: ASSAD CANNOT BE STOPPED FROM USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS IF HE CHOSE TO
DO SO
At a joint news conference, retiring
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs, Gen. Martin
Dempsey, cleaned the Pentagon’s SYRIAN desk ready for incoming Secretary Chuck
Hagel. Boiled down to essentials, their triple message was that Bashar
Assad could not be stopped from using chemical weapons if he chose to do so,
that securing the CW sites after Assad’s fall was the job of the “international
community” and that no US ground troops would be sent to SYRIA.
Panetta and Dempsey essentially
confirmed a fact first reported by debkafile in the third week of November: US
naval, air and marine forces were withdrawn from SYRIAN offshore waters
following the White House's decision to stay clear of military involvement in
the SYRIAN conflict. After extending SYRIAN opposition forces diplomatic
support for nearly two years, the Obama administration is dumping the Assad
headache in the laps of SYRIA’S immediate neighbors, TURKEY, JORDAN and ISRAEL,
and casting the rebels adrift.
Background Information:
Background Information:
Geopolitical Analysis and Monitoring indicated already in June 2011: http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2011/06/nato-rules-out-military-intervention-in.html
UNITED STATES IS NOT CONSIDERING SENDING IN GROUND TROOPS
This decision was spelled out with crystal clarity by Panetta and Dempsey at a joint Washington press conference in Washington:
This decision was spelled out with crystal clarity by Panetta and Dempsey at a joint Washington press conference in Washington:
“The UNITED STATES is increasingly
focused on how to secure SYRIA'S chemical weapons if President Bashar al-Assad
falls from power,” said the outgoing defense secretary. In reference to the
problem while Assad is still in place, Panetta emphasized that the UNITED
STATES is not considering sending in ground troops.
At one stroke, he refuted Western and ISRAELI media claims of AMERICAN and ISRAELI Special Forces operating at the chemical weapons sites.
At one stroke, he refuted Western and ISRAELI media claims of AMERICAN and ISRAELI Special Forces operating at the chemical weapons sites.
US TO ASSAD: NOT USING SYRIA’S CHEMICAL ARSENAL, ENHANCE HIS
CHANCES OF STAYING IN POWER
His words also broadly hinted to
Bashar Assad that, if he kept his hands off using his chemical arsenal, he
would enhance his chances of staying in power, because after AMERICA’S exit
from the war scene, no other military force would be around to help the
opposition remove him.
Panetta was less clear about the so-called “international community” – an amorphous entity in every sense. He said: "I think the greater concern right now is what steps the international community takes to make sure that when Assad comes down, there is a process and procedure to make sure we get our hands on securing those sites. That I think is the greater challenge right now."
Panetta was less clear about the so-called “international community” – an amorphous entity in every sense. He said: "I think the greater concern right now is what steps the international community takes to make sure that when Assad comes down, there is a process and procedure to make sure we get our hands on securing those sites. That I think is the greater challenge right now."
The US government was discussing the
issue with ISRAEL and other countries in the region, he said, but ruled out
deploying AMERICAN ground forces in any "hostile" setting. He
repeated: "We're not talking about ground troops."
SYRIA CANNOT BE STOPPED FROM USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS IF IT CHOSE TO
DO SO
The defense secretary did not say
exactly how this international coalition would function or whether it would go
into action if Assad himself embarked on chemical warfare. Neither did he refer
to the claim leaked by BRITISH intelligence this week that the SYRIAN stock of
50 tonnes of un-enriched uranium, enough for weapons grade fuel for five
nuclear devices, had gone missing and may have passed to IRAN.
Gen Dempsey, addressing the same
press conference, spoke about the current problem: He said that if Assad chose
to use his chemical stockpiles against opposition forces, it would be virtually
impossible to stop him. Preventing the launch of chemical weapons "would
be almost unachievable,” he said “... because you would have to have such
clarity of intelligence, you know, persistent surveillance, you would have to
actually see it before it happened."
Background Information:
SYRIA – ASSAD – FIRM IN SADDLE
GEOPOLITICAL ANALYSIS AND MONITORING wrote March
08th 2012 that: Contrary
to the weapons of mass destruction hoax fabricated by the USA in order to
justify the IRAQ invasion, SYRIA really posses such lethal arsenal and probably will not hesitate to use them when cornered.
See full article: http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/03/given-fact-syria-does-possess-chemical.html
US INTELLIGENCE: ASSAD FIRMLY IN CHARGE
IN SYRIA
http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/03/syria.html
He added that “messaging” to the SYRIAN
ruler publicly warning him that the use of chemical weapons would cross a red
line, established a deterrent, because “he might think it would prompt
outright US or international intervention leading to his downfall. But that’s
different from preemption.”
Dempsey was repeating Panetta’s implied message to Assad that avoiding chemical warfare would extend the life of his regime, say our sources.
Dempsey was repeating Panetta’s implied message to Assad that avoiding chemical warfare would extend the life of his regime, say our sources.
US military sources later told
reporters that, while Dempsey and Panetta believe sarin gas will break down
after 60 days – “That’s what the scientists tell us,” Dempsey said, US
government sources have suggested that “SYRIAN sophistication with chemical
weaponry may leave the combined, weaponized sarin deadly for up to a
year.” Sarin, they say, is exceptionally hard to dispose of.
debkafile reports: This confusion is compounded by the decoys used by the SYRIAN army to conceal its chemical weapons stocks, which are now believed to have been distributed among different SYRIAN Air Force bases.
debkafile reports: This confusion is compounded by the decoys used by the SYRIAN army to conceal its chemical weapons stocks, which are now believed to have been distributed among different SYRIAN Air Force bases.
WIND OF CHANGE: DEFENSIVE POSTURES AMONG SYRIA’S NEIGHBORING
COUNTRIES ?
ISRAEL has responded to the US
withdrawal from the SYRIAN arena with a decision announced by Prime Minister
Binyamin Netanyahu that ISRAEL has started erecting a special security fence
along its 57-kilometer boundary with SYRIA.
 |
| Chemical storage facilities in Libya |
Ankara's response has been to
segregate TURKEY from the SYRIAN conflict behind the six Patriot anti-missile
batteries provided by NATO and place them on the border of its embattled
neighbor in defensive array.
Indeed, both countries have retreated to defensive postures. However, neither the Patriots nor the wall will be much use should chemical weapons fall into rebel hands, including the Islamist terrorists in their ranks, and they decide to use them
Indeed, both countries have retreated to defensive postures. However, neither the Patriots nor the wall will be much use should chemical weapons fall into rebel hands, including the Islamist terrorists in their ranks, and they decide to use them
No comments:
Post a Comment