EAST
AND WEST EMPIRE SATURATION – WHERE AND WHEN WILL THEY COLLIDE?
The
operational modalities of the UNITED STATES as the ’police of the world’ are
viewed by many with envy and with disgust. When the USA is advance its economic
interests its massive military power projects far ahead of any diplomatic
efforts. That is a luxury that others do not have. The US has benefited from
this arrangement immensely and rival nations are attempting to reshape this
model adding their own cultural sensibilities. As the old adage goes, ’talk
softly but carry a big stick’.
Without worrying about credible justification, the US
intervened militarily in PUERTO RICO (1824), MEXICO (1845 and 1847), NICARAGUA
(1857 and 1860) and in the province of PANAMA (1860). Alarmed, the governments
of CHILE, BOLIVIA, ECUADOR, NEW GRENADA (COLOMBIA) and PERU met in Lima in 1847
to examine this interventionism. The outbreak of war against MEXICO in 1848
justified their concern: from Texas to California, the US annexed half MEXICO’S
territory. After its own Civil War, the US became aware of its huge power. From
1880, having conquered the West, it turned its attention to the South. During
General Grant’s presidency (1869-77), the theory of “manifest destiny” made
clear US ambitions: to control the continent. The US spoke about the “defence
of democracy” softly, and sent in the marines by way of a big stick. Besides
the occasional military intervention, there were invasions followed by
establishment of protectorates. --Le
Monde
Many
nations have been quietly sitting on the sidelines watching the UNITED STATES operating
with righteous impunity. Beasts from the east are looking to not only stand up
to AMERICA but slowly chip away at their turf. CHINA’S is following bits of the
US playbook when it comes to their mixed-market economy, while rapidly building
up their military force. CHINA is leveraging their military to intimidate any
who would interfere with their economic aspirations while appearing meek and
adamantly denying all accusations.
SOFT POWER VERSUS HARD POWER
Evidence compiled by The Sunday Age reveals that, in its
relations with AUSTRALIA, CHINA uses its power to co-opt support and silence
critics. Sometimes, it involves intimidation and threats. In international
relations, there is soft power and there is hard power. Exercising it is how
governments get their way. CHINA’S communist rulers are no different. They
legitimately use soft power to win foreign friends and gain international
influence. The tools of soft power are culture, education, public diplomacy,
business links and people-to-people contacts. Then there’s hard power — overt
pressure or threats. In CHINA’S case, its hard power carries more punch than
most and, in relations with AUSTRALIA, it’s backed by lots of money.
–The Age
The focus on peace, development, and cooperation was
welcomed and continues as the main emphasis in CHINESE foreign policy; but it
has been accompanied in recent years by repeated use of coercion and
intimidation well beyond internationally accepted norms in support of CHINESE
broad maritime claims in the SOUTH CHINA Sea and the EAST CHINA Sea. In short,
the principles and praxis of CHINESE foreign and security policy have evolved
and continue to change, reflecting a mix of domestic priorities, challenges and
considerations, as well as treatment and acceptance by neighbors and others
abroad. –CSIS
CHINA
has been building a massive economic engine due to the needs of its gargantuan
population. There have been subtle hints of a coming insurrection within CHINA
due to pollution, corruption, land grabbing, limited water supply, and
inflation of food prices. Over the last few years there have been major riots
that have instilled fear within the leadership of CHINA. CHINA is digging its
heels into the SOUTH CHINA SEA and the INDIAN OCEAN to apply its new economic
and military grand strategy, building a new “Silk Road” between sea lines to
ensure proper transport of its imports and military infrastructure. CHINA is
weary of both RUSSIA and INDIA and do not want to find being cut off from the
rest of the world. A military or financial blockade in the straits by its
enemies or past allies would be debilitating.
ASIA-PACIFIC
STRATEGIC RETRENCHMENT: POLITICAL AND MILITARY OBJECTIVES
The
USA, JAPAN and CHINA are
projecting power and expanding maritime and mainland strategic defenses within
the ASIA-PACIFIC landscape for control of trade sea routes, strategic raw materials – hydrocarbons
hubs and security of geographic provinces of strategic interest. The ASIA-PACIFIC
geopolitical scenario will be no easy task since ASIAN nations are interplaying
AMERICANS and CHINESE, with the U.S. military providing security and CHINA
providing economic fringe benefits.
“As you look at the Asia Pacific,
it’s about competition for resources, limited resources,“ It’s about making sure that
everyone is able to sustain their own sovereignty and their interests” – US
Chief of Army Staff General Raymond T Odierno- American Enterprise Institute
Pentagon
and civilian leaders are rapidly increasing U.S. Army, Marines and U.S. Navy presence in CHINA’S backyard. CHINA’S
naval fleet, the largest in ASIA, which boasts 62 submarines, 13
destroyers and 65 frigates of active ships in the region. The U.S. military is
increasing military footprints, boots on the ground with U.S. Marines, Joint Special Operations Command, military equipment depots and strategic intelligence and aerospace footprint
with locales in AUSTRALIA, VIETNAM , CAMBODIA and the PHILIPPINES. Not only is the vast deployment of
U.S. military armed forces concentrated toward CHINA’S expansion, these forces
will provide security for vested interests in the region – JAPANESE Ichthys Gas , Royal Dutch Shell , ExxonMobil, Forum Energy and trillions of dollars worth of oil found in AUSTRALIAN
outback. Coincidence?
The PHILIPPINES and U.S. military
are considering the development of a territorial defense force orce capable of
handling the PHILIPPINES’ strategic interest in the SOUTH CHINA SEA, a
high-ranking U.S. military – ABS
The proposed airfields and naval
bases in the PHILIPPINES, a close U.S. ally, coincides with a resurgence of
U.S. warships, planes and personnel in the region as Washington turns its
attention to a newly assertive China – Reuters
CHINA’S
rising military power in the region is expanding well beyond it’s borders
through stealth wars and operations , key transport and
delivery of strategic resources and continued intrusion on
nations economic exclusive zones. CHINA’S activities in
the region are necessary to nourish it’s regional appetite for power, influence
and resources, diplomacy necessary to sustain the CHINESE economic engine. JAPANS
considerable dependence on imported energy resources (90%) transiting routes of
Malacca – South and East CHINA Sea is a high risk of engagement of military forces and energy firms
with CHINA over territorial disputes especially over oil and gas in the heavily disputed Okinawa and Diaoyu-Senkaku Islands .
CHINESE state-run oil companies
hope to develop seven new gas fields in the East CHINA Sea, possibly siphoning
gas from the seabed beneath waters claimed by Japan, a move that could further
inflame tensions with Tokyo over the disputed area- Gulf Times
However, whichever side you fall
on, the fact remains that CNOOC is CHINA’S largest offshore exploration and
production company which takes its mandate from Beijing to secure as much oil
and gas as possible, seriously – Energy Tribune
U.S.
and Philippines strategic architecture is operation acquisition prevention, AirSea Battle vs anti-access/anti-denial capabilities (A2/AD), military’s offshore control concept to ensure the
flow of strategic assets to U.S. allies while blockading CHINESE access, interdict import of strategic raw materials at vital sea gates and choke points and inhibit CHINESE
corporate offshore oil and natural gas energy and naval activities in the exclusive economic zones,
mainly CHINA’S 9-dash line territorial claim over PANATAG, Parcel and Spratly Islands of the South CHINA
Sea.
The PHILIPPINES has deployed a
fresh batch of marines and supplies to a shoal in the disputed South CHINA Sea,
where a CHINESE warship and surveillance vessels appeared last month and
triggered a new standoff in the strategic waters, the PHILIPPINE defense
secretary said on June 19 – Asahi.
Military’s Northern Luzon Command
(Nolcom) is shifting its operations from internal security to territorial
defense in 2014, focusing on the Luzon coastlines amid disputes over marine
boundaries in Southeast Asia, the new Nolcom chief – Inquirer
A decades-old territorial
squabble over the South CHINA Sea is entering a new and more contentious
chapter, as claimant nations search deeper into disputed waters for energy
supplies while building up their navies and military alliances with other
nations, particularly with the UNITED STATES – Reuters
The PHILIPPINES plans to relocate
major air force and navy camps to a former US naval base north of Manila to
gain faster access to waters being contested by CHINA in the South CHINA Sea- South China Morning Post
Strategic
dialogue between the U.S., CHINA and JAPAN over economic exclusive zones, oil
and gas regions and military encounters over territorial disputes could easily
ignite a South CHINA Sea Flashpoint . With hardly any noise
or accusations from pundits, the U.S. massive military and diplomatic buildup
in the ASIAN Block is a counter-move toward CHINA’S renminbi bloc and forestall the creation of
multinational ASIAN block adopting the Yuan as a primary currency and the direct
exchange of oil and gas for Yuans.
Beijing’s possible move to back
the yuan with gold would not be meant as a strategic measure to strengthen the
national currency and increase its attractiveness as an investment medium.
Rather, it would be a flaunt aimed at demonstrating to the world (and to the
USA in particular) that CHINA is capable of taking the risks associated with a
departure from the dollar standard – RBTH
CHINA may soon start direct
trading between the yuan and the AUSTRALIAN dollar, bypassing the U.S. dollar
when exchanging the units, to take advantage of growing financial and trading
ties between two nations – WSJ
HIGH
PROBABILITY OF A FUTURE SMALL SCALE WAR OVER SHRINKING STRATEGIC RESOURCES?
When considering CHINAS A2-AD strategy, one popular
theory is that CHINA would go all in launching massive saturation missile
strikes on AMERICA and JAPANESE bases to gain advantage and attain victory
The
US-PH alliance is erecting an offensive/defensive perimeter in the Asia-Pacific
to secure jump-off points for pre-emptive strike capabilities. The Pentagon is
increasing the MEU to 2500 in Darwin, increasing rotational Naval and JSOC operations in the PHILIPPINES ,
shifting Marines from JAPAN to GUAM which all could find
themselves transiting the region in littoral combat ships as part of the Single Naval Strategy. The PHILIPPINES are
planning to relocate air and naval forces to Subic Bay to cut
reaction time by fighter aircraft to contested South CHINA Sea areas. JAPAN is
revamping Self Defense Forces from a defensive position to first strike – amphibious island capturing abilities with military frontiers to counter CHINESE intrusion
and defend JAPANS East CHINA Sea territories and
energy resources.
CHINA is deploying naval operations west to shield Middle East oil routes. CHINESE submarines loaded with nuclear missiles
are on high alert as counteroffensive strategy to turn SOUTH CHINA SEA into off
limits zone. CHINA’S military test firing of anti-satellite rockets capable of disrupting
communications and the navigation of U.S. carrier strike groups. Pointed at TAIWAN
are Carrier Hunter anti-ship warheads intended to
destroy the ships’ flight decks, launch catapults and control towers. CHINA’S growing
naval assertiveness by circumventing gaps in JAPAN’S Maritime Chokepoints and
launching coastguard paramilitary vessels to keep pressure
on JAPAN over disputed islands in the EAST CHINA SEA.
No comments:
Post a Comment