Syria: The Most Sought After Chess Piece

FRANCE EAGER TO ENGAGE IN SYRA. WHY?

French Syrian Mandate Flag

 

VIA BBC:  

FRANCE'S HOLLANDE BACKS US ON SYRIA ACTION

France is still ready to take action in Syria alongside the US, despite UK MPs blocking British involvement, President Francois Hollande has said……….

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23897775

FRENCH COLONIZERS HAVE NOT ACCEPTED THE LOSS OF THEIR COLONY

By Elena Gromova 

History stutters: the new leader of the SYRIAN National Coalition, knighted by the West, is none other than the grand-son of one of the chief collaborators of the FRENCH occupation of SYRIA in the 20s. Formerly, the FRENCH colonial power resorted to religious leaders to teach submission to the people under its domination; today it relies on clerics to overthrow the secular regime of the SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC.

 FRANCES "COLONIAL AMBITIONS" IN SYRIA?

 

More than 70 years has passed and the grandson of this Nur-Eddin – Mouaz al-Khatib, a former preacher at the Umayyad mosque in Damascus and now a deserter and traitor – has been elected head of the “QATAR COALITION” which was created on 11 November at a meeting in DOHA.

 

Left Picture: French Circassian Cavalry assembling outside the railway station at Damascus, French Mandate of Syria in preparation of the surrendering ceremony to Axis officials, Sep 1941

FRANCE has shown its gratitude to the third-generation collaborator al-Khatib, whose grandfather collaborated with the colonisers, for his faithful service. Namely the former colonial power has been the first to recognise the “QATAR COALITION” as a legitimate representative of the SYRIAN people. It is no surprise that the flag of the “opposition” – green, white and black with three stars – is the same as the flag from the time when SYRIA was under FRENCH mandate.

No sooner had SYRIA gained their freedom from TURKISH rule than it immediately fell under the authority of the FRENCH in 1920, and the League of Nations gave FRANCE a mandate to control SYRIA. The FRENCH occupation army, headed by General Henri Gouraud, faced weak opposition from an armed SYRIAN army which had only just been formed and had nothing except rifles and machine guns, while the FRENCH had heavy artillery and aircraft. The conflict was one-sided.

GENERAL YUSUF AL-’AZMA 1883-1920

The SYRIAN Minister of War Yusuf al-’Azma accepted the battle, knowing it would be impossible to win, but being a true patriot of his homeland, he was unable to allow the FRENCH to take Damascus without a fight. The battle took place 23 kilometres from Damascus, in the mountainous region of Maysalun. Yusuf al-’Azma personally took part in the one-sided battle. The soldiers fought for a whole day, but the superiority of the FRENCH was just too great. Only when all the SYRIAN soldiers had been killed were the FRENCH able to advance on Damascus.

Syrians and Druses rose up against the FRENCH occupiers in 1925 and even managed to liberate Damascus, but the FRENCH used their military strength to quash the uprising in 1927. The first shot of the uprising was fired on 7 June 1925 – a hero of the uprising, Hussein Murshid Radwan, wounded a FRENCH officer when he ordered a peaceful anti-FRENCH demonstration to be broken up.

SYRIA reveres its heroes and at the beginning of November, a magnificent monument was erected in the city of Suwayda in Hussein Murshid Radwan’s honour. The sculptor, Fuad Naim, has paid particular attention to the hero’s enormous sword which he has clenched in his mighty hand while challenging the FRENCH to battle.

FRANCE LOST SYRIA. SOMETHING IT CANNOT OVERCOME IT SEEMS 

In the center of Damascus, meanwhile, there is a monument in honor of the SYRIAN Defense Minister Yusuf al-’Azma, a hero of the Battle of Maysalun Pass. Here we have genuine insurgents who fought for a free SYRIA. Now, however, the word “insurgent” has been completely defiled and is used today to refer to all sorts of rubbish recruited from all corners of the world who are high on drugs and murdering SYRIANS for money.

Until quite recently there was another monument in honour of al-’Azma which stood near the General Staff building. On 3 September this year, however, during an attack on the General Staff building, terrorists did not spare this monument. The vandals destroyed it. Can SYRIA’S history really be that dear to these mercenaries? Or to the descendants of those who collaborated with the occupiers?

70 years has passed since FRANCE lost SYRIA as one of its colonies and was forced to recognize its independence. As recent events have shown, however, FRANCE just cannot ignore the colonial itch. It is doing everything to regain its sovereignty, although this time around, even if they conquer SYRIA, it would no longer be full sovereignty since FRANCE would have to share it with the USA, Turkey and other NATO partners. This is not troubling Hollande, however, who is backing every reprobate in SYRIA so long as the reprobate’s position falls within the neocolonial plans of FRANCE’S false socialists.

Back in the summer, French Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault did not hesitate in saying that FRANCE was supplying SYRIAN fighters with communication equipment and other technology. He spoke as though the equipment was not for the purpose of killing. But it is all the same – is it really not going to aid the murderers?

FRANCES INTENTIONS TO CREATE A “BUFFER” ZONE AND A “NO-FLY” ZONE HAD TO BE ABOLISHED 

And now the pseudo-socialist François Hollande has held a meeting with the old collaborator’s grandson, Mouaz al-Khatib. After the meeting in Paris, the ambassador of the SYRIAN terrorists showed up – a certain Munzir Makhous who, together with his boss, was part of the delegation who visited the Élysée Palace and implored Hollande to supply the fighters with heavy artillery. Hollande promised to bring the matter up for discussion with the countries of the EU.

Earlier, Hollande had announced his intentions to create a “buffer” zone and a “no-fly” zone in SYRIA. At that time, however, his own foreign secretary threw cold water on his plans by announcing that such zones could only be created by a decision of the UN Security Council. And the position of the UN Security Council is clear – RUSSIA and CHINA will not give the go ahead for yet more ventures like the ones that have already ruined LIBYA. Knowing this, however, Hollande is trying to raise the morale of the terrorists operating within SYRIA. In order to do this, he is promising to create a “no-fly zone” – the relentless bombardment of SYRIA, in other words – and this is the one thing that the terrorists want. They are putting themselves at risk every time they place an improvised explosive device near a school, a hospital, a shopping center, a mosque. Obviously they want to get support from the air so that they no longer have to risk their lives.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes%E2%80%93Picot_Agreement

While the SYRIAN government and the SYRIAN people are placing monuments in honor of their heroes, the so-called “opposition members” are collaborating with the neocolonialists, making much of the colonialists’ flags while killing soldiers and civilians. FRANCE recognizes these murderers and terrorists as “legitimate representatives of the SYRIAN people”. The only question is whether “representatives” like these are what the SYRIAN people really need.

SYRIAN CONFLICT: LUCRATIVE FOR US DEFENSE INDUSTRY

THE ONE GRAPH THAT SUMS UP WHY TO LAUNCH AN ATTACK ON SYRIA 

By Chris Miles via Policymic

Geopolitical Analysis and Monitoring wrote on 28 Aug 2013:

"With short surgical missile strikes the USA saves its face by sticking to its threat; mainstream media on the other hand has its action extravaganza, portraying the intervention in an inflated way in order to continue the propaganda-media war which has raged in SYRIA since the beginning of the uprising and last but not least the weapons industry will also be a benefit, for the uprising in SYRIA will continue for quite some time."

Read entire article at: 

http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.co.at/2013/08/us-military-intervention-in-syrian.html

If ever there was a sign of the military industrial complex in America, this graph is it.

Reports that the United States is very near to launching an attack against Syria to punish Damascus for the use of chemical weapons sent Raytheon’s stock price to a 52-week high this week.
Who is Raytheon? The manufacturer of the BGM-109, more commonly known as the Tomahawk missile, the weapon of choice of the Obama administration in any strike against Syria.

Raytheon stock has surged over the past two months, coinciding with the biggest U.S. military build-up America has mounted since it launched an assault against Libya in 2011.
Raytheon is a Cambridge, Mass.,-based American defense contractor with total employment of 72,400 people. It is the world’s largest manufacturer of guided missiles and produces such widely used weapons as the AIM-7 Sparrow missile, the AIM-9 Sidewinder missile and the BGM-109 Tomahawk. The company is also responsible for the Air Warfare Simulation program used by the Air Force. According to the Wall Street Journal, in 2010, the company had nearly $23 billion in arms sales, more than 90% of its total revenue for the year.
The Pentagon buys 196 Tomahawk missiles a year, considered the "minimum sustaining rate" for the U.S. military's arsenal. And there are some key members of Congress who think more should be spent on these weapons.
“There are many of us who have been concerned for years about maintaining our missile capabilities,” said Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah), a member of the House Armed Services Committee, to Politico.
Raytheon has delivered 252 missiles this fiscal year and 361 last fiscal year. War with Syria means that there would likely be a future increase in orders for the missiles, which can go for about $1 million a pop. In the 2011 U.S. military adventure into Libya, 124 Tomahawk missiles were fired by U.S. and UK ships against Libyan targets. The Libya campaign would give a comparable bar on how many Tomahawk missiles will be used in a Syrian campaign.

Supply and demand

The BGM-109 has been used in each of America's official conflicts in the last 22 years. Using wings and a flight system, cruise missiles like the Tomahawk are designed to carry a heavy warhead at subsonic speeds over a significant distance. Originally developed by General Dynamics in the 70s, the 3,500 lb. 20 foot long Tomahawk missile is now manufactured by Raytheon, a large U.S. defense contractor. Each unit can cost anywhere from the mid-$500,000s to almost $1.5 million, depending on the chosen configuration, payload, and booster deployment. The missile's modular system allows it to carry a conventional or nuclear payload if needed.




In its budget submission for fiscal 2013, the White House requested 196 Tomahawks, for a total program cost of $320 million. The White House is requesting the same amount next fiscal year, for a cost of $325 million.
War is big business, and Syria is paying the bills.
Need more proof that companies are profiting off of the recent Syria war mongering?
Lockheed Martin — the largest arms-producing and military services company in the world, with nearly $3 billion more in arms sales — saw its stock spike to a six month high on Monday, the day that the war drums with Syria really started beating.

SYRIA: US MILITARY INTERVENTION

LIKELY FORTHCOMING SCENARIO 

The US administration placed itself in a dilemma after announcing the “Red Line” doctrine regarding the use of chemical weapons in SYRIA. In order to maintain its credibility the US is now forced to react, at least that is what the US wants the public to believe. AMERICAN public on the other hand strongly oppose US intervention and involvement in SYRIA.

Update:

Element of surprise lost

From the military perspective, current attack revelations by the U.S. government in terms of SYRIA is counterproductive. The impending strike against the Assad regime is the best pre- announced missile attack in history.  Thus the element of surprise is lost and therefore the US are now stalling by claiming the administration has not yet decided if and when to attack. Or are this just deceiving tactics?

Another scenario could be that ISRAEL has received updated intelligence to the fact that if the US and its allies initiate a strike, Assad could launch bio - chemical warheads against ISRAEL and its allies in the region. And thus the US and its allies are debating if they are able to knock out the majority of chemical weapon storage sites in Syria efficiently.

SHORT SURGICAL MISSILE STRIKES BY USA AND ITS ALLIES, SIMILAR TO THOSE CONDUCTED BY ISRAEL IN RECENT PAST 

Thus a US military intervention in SYRIA in most likelihood will be short surgical missile strikes similar to those conducted by ISRAEL in recent past in SYRIA, and let the UK, FRANCE and TURKEY intervene in a more complex, mainly clandestine way. But even public opinion in the UK seems to oppose UK involvement in the conflict, thus making every step Britain’s politicians make, precarious one. 

With short surgical missile strikes the USA saves its face by sticking to its threat; mainstream media on the other hand has its action extravaganza, portraying the intervention in an inflated way in order to continue the propaganda-media war which has raged in SYRIA since the beginning of the uprising and last but not least the weapons industry will also be a benefiter, for the uprising in SYRIA will continue for quite some time.

Interesting to note is that GERMANY’S stance is hardly ever mentioned when it comes to an allied military intervention in SYRIA. Granted GERMANY has upcoming elections in a couple of weeks and thus prefers to keep a low profile on the international stage, but on the other hand is the key player in the EUROPEAN UNION and usually does not let FRANCE and BRITAIN take the helm regarding EU foreign policies. 

RUSSIA WILL NOT INTERVENE 

RUSSIA on the other hand, despite being a strong ally of SYRIA will not intervene in case of US military intervention in SYRIA. Thus the question remains if IRAN will openly intervene. Most probably not, IRAN will use strong accusative rhetoric’s but will refrain from engaging openly in the conflict, but rather step up terror attacks against ISRAEL and the USA and its allies through its proxy, Hezbollah in LEBANON. 

CLOSE COORDINATION BETWEEN THE USA AND ISRAEL 

Post US intervention scenario

ISRAEL clearly will have strong influence on US decision making and on how the intervention in SYRIA will be conducted, for clearly the repercussions of such attack will be significant for ISRAEL, thus surgical – cosmetic strikes are the most likely scenario. Which leaves the question, why BRITAIN and FRANCE are so eager to engage in SYRIA?  

Is it a deception tactic coordinated with the USA and ISRAEL, or do the two former imperialist, colonialist powers of the region anticipate geo- strategic advantages if the current regime is toppled in order to implement a similar strategy as was the case with the Sykes Picot Agreement between FRANCE and BRITAIN, which divided the region and specifically SYRIA between the two countries. The 1915 agreement some argue, was the reason not only for the division of SYRIA but also the starting point of the ISRAELI Palestinian conflict and thereby causing instability in the entire region.

See: SYKES PICOT AGREEMENT http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes%E2%80%93Picot_Agreement

FRANCES COLONIAL AMBITIONS IN SYRIA http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.co.at/2012/12/frances-colonial-ambitions-in-syria.html

SYRIA WILL PROBABLY CONDUCT A FEW CONVENTIONAL MISSILE ATTACKS AGAINST UNPOPULATED AREAS IN ISRAEL

In retaliation to a Western attack, SYRIA will most likely launch one or two conventional missiles into ISRAEL, making sure to cause minimum damage, for they know ISRAEL favors the current regime over a scattered Islamic fundamentalist regime. 

Geopolitical Analysis and Monitoring wrote June 2012: ISRAEL’S INTERESTS

……..This is almost certainly because the ISRAELI Prime Minister would, on balance, prefer the Assad regime to continue; it is a known quantity and any new regime could severely destabilize the effective balance-of-power between two uneasy neighbors’………… 

(Read the entire article at:http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/06/syria-feasts-and-rites-of-confusion.html

 

TURKEY and the GULF STATES will provide support for the USA but will refrain from conducting their own intervention scenario and focus on clandestine insurgence operations, propaganda and logistic support.

RUSSIA, as mentioned above, will not intervene militarily once the US engages in SYRIA, but most probably will increase weapon supplies to SYRIA, a lucrative business for all parties involved, because the civil war in SYRIA will in most likelihood continue for a long time, similar to the civil war in LEBANON which lasted 15 years.

US PIVOT: IT IS NOT US INTENTION TO TOPPLE ASSAD!

Interesting to note is that the USA recently claimed it is not the USA’S intention to topple Assad, because he is the lesser of the two evils, when it comes to choose between Assad and Islamic Fundamentalists. The reason for this shift in rhetoric’s could be that the US is finally becoming fully aware that if Assad is cornered, he might really launch his bio – chemical weapons, thus ignite a full scale war in the region, for unlike IRAQ, SYRIA possesses bio – chemical warheads. 

GEOPOLITICAL ANALYSIS AND MONITORING wrote March 08^th 2012 that: Contrary to the weapons of mass destruction hoax fabricated by the USA in order to justify the IRAQ invasion, SYRIA really posses such lethal arsenal and probably will not hesitate to use them when cornered. 

Read full article at: http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/03/given-fact-syria-does-possess-chemical.html

UNPREDICTABLE REACTION FROM THE ASSAD CLAN IF CORNERED   http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.co.at/2012/06/syria-israel-iran-and-usa.html

SYRIA’S BIO – CHEMICAL WARFARE THREAT? LEGITIMATE, OR A WELCOME EXCUSE FOR US INTERVENTION? 

http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.ar/2012/06/syria_11.html

WELCOME TO THE MIDDLE EAST

IRAN is backing Assad. The GULF STATES are against Assad!

Assad is against the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood and Obama are against General Sisi.

But the GOLF STATES are pro-Sisi! Meaning they are against the Muslim Brotherhood!
Iran is pro. Hamas, but Hamas is backing the Muslim Brotherhood!

Obama is backing the Muslim Brotherhood, yet Hamas are against the US!

The GULF STATES are pro US.

TURKEY is with GULF STATES against Assad; yet TURKEY is pro-Muslim Brotherhood and against General Sisi, and General Sisi is being backed by the GULF STATES!

Welcome to the MIDDLE EAST and have a nice day.

GLOBAL INFLATION HAS BEGUN:

THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM IS TILTING

Globale Inflation hat begonnen: Das Finanzsystem kippt 

Via Deutsche Mittelstands Nachrichten  

Die dramatischen Zusammenbrüche in den jungen Volkswirtschaften der Welt sind Vorboten für den Crash des Weltfinanzsystems. Der Schulden-Tsunami rollt an. Er wird zu einer Inflation des Zorns gegen jene führen, die sich die Ausbeutung der Welt zum Ziel gemacht haben. Das Ende wird schmerzhaft sein, sagt Marc Faber. Christine Lagarde spricht vom Dammbruch, gegen den Verteidigungs-Linien errichtet werden müssen. Doch die Angreifer handeln aus Notwehr: Millionen Menschen beginnen, gegen das Finanzsystem zu rebellieren. Die Lage kippt. 

Die Alchemisten des globalen Finanz-Systems werden unruhig. Aus vielen Ländern der Erde kommen beunruhigende Zeichen.Und sie kommen in immer schnellerer Folge.

Die Schulden-Blase beginnt zu platzen. Die Folgen sind klar: Inflation und soziale Unruhen.

 

In immer schnellerer Folge geraten Länder unter Druck, die in den vergangenen Jahren die bevorzugten Ziele einer globalen Spekulations-Elite geworden sind. Währungen sind mit einem Mal nicht mehr wert: Brasilien, die Türkei, Indien, Indonesien, Südafrika – überall beschleunigen sich inflationäre Tendenzen.

Das Kapital wird nervös. Es zieht sich aus jenen Ländern zurück, in die es die verantwortungslose Niedrigzins-Politik der Zentralbanken getrieben hat. Zurück bleiben immer größere soziale Probleme.

Der Investor Marc Faber hat in einer sehr scharfsinnigen Analyse (Video am Ende des Artikels) genau vor dieser Entwicklung gewarnt. 

Faber erklärt, dass das maßlose Gelddrucken zu keiner Inflation in den USA oder in Europa geführt hat. Durch die unkontrollierten internationalen Verflechtungen wurde die Inflation exportiert. Anleger haben in Blasen investiert, weil sie von den Zentralbanken verführt wurden. Wie schon beim Internet-Boom, bei der Immobilien-Blase oder beim Goldrausch sind gewaltige Summen über Finanzprodukte in die sogenannten Schwellenländer geflossen.

Die Fiktion, mit der die globale Finanzindustrie operiert hat, ist simpel: Durch das viele Geld sind keine Produkte oder Werte geschaffen worden. Es wurden einfach die Preise von Assets erhöht. Faber sagt, dass das Bruttosozialprodukt der ganzen Welt in einem Jahr so hoch ist wie die Summe der künstlichen Finanz-Papiere, die innerhalb einer einzigen Woche auf den Markt geworfen werden.

Die Folge: Diejenigen, die in einer real existierenden Wirtschaft leben müssen, können sich nichts mehr leisten. Faber, der in Asien lebt, beschreibt die Lage in Thailand: Wegen des Irrsinns der Spekulationen sind die Immobilienpreise so massiv gestiegen, dass sich eine junge thailändische Familie kein Haus mehr leisten kann. Die Lebensmittelpreise sind explodiert. Für die Reichen der Welt ist das kein Problem: Wer eine Million Dollar im Jahr zur Verfügung hat, gibt nur 3 Prozent für Lebensmittel aus. Wer 1.000 Dollar im Jahr verdient, gibt 60 Prozent und mehr für das Essen aus.

Das ist der Punkt, an dem das morsches System bricht.

Brechen muss.

Nach Fabers Einschätzung waren die Unruhen in Tunesien, Ägypten, der Türkei und anderswo ausschließlich soziale Unruhen. Die Leute rebellieren, weil sie keine Zukunft mehr haben.

In Europa und den USA wird der Ausbruch von Unruhen noch verhindert, weil die Staaten manisch weiter Geld in die Sozialsysteme pumpen, um die Leute ruhig zu stellen – Geld, das sie nicht mehr haben.

Zugleich wird die Gesellschaft immer älter – und es ist eine Überlebensfrage für die Systeme, dass die Rentner Geld bekommen. Die Pensionsfonds sind hypernervös, weil sie wissen: Wenn das Finanzsystem wirklich crasht, können sie die Renten nicht mehr bezahlen. Sie jagen daher von einer Blase in die nächste.

Doch bald gibt es keinen sicheren Ort mehr.

Denn am Ende muss hinter jedem Investment, selbst hinter dem absurdesten Finanzprodukt, ein realer Wert stehen: Ein Unternehmen, ein Stück Land, ein Rohstoff.

Doch die realen Werte können mit den Preisen nicht mithalten, die diese selbstmörderische Strategie der globalen Spekulanten in die Höhe getrieben haben.

Und nun wollen die Alchemisten, die das Fiasko ausgelöst haben, den Geist wieder in die Flasche zurückdrängen.

Doch das gelingt nicht.

Der Geist ist aus der Flasche, es ist der Ungeist der ungedeckten Kredite, der Todeshauch der globalen Schulden.

Das System steckt in der Falle.

IWF-Chefin Christine Lagarde hat in ihrer Rede vor den Finanz-Jongleuren in Jackson Hole daher die Kassandra gegeben und gesagt: Der Damm drohe zu brechen. Es müssen Verteidigungslinien erreichtet werden, um den System-Crash zu verhindern.

Die Krise in den Schwellenländern gerät außer Kontrolle. Hilflos hat Lagarde angekündigt, der IWF stehe bereit, Ländern, die in Not geraten zu helfen.

Mit politischem Rat.

Mit Geld.

Doch auch der IWF hat kein Geld mehr.

Es wurde zu viel gedruckt.

Geld verliert in dem Moment seinen Wert, wenn hinter dem Geld nichts mehr steckt. Diesen Moment erleben wir gerade.

Daher fummeln die Zentralbanker, die von niemandem gewählten, niemand verantwortlichen, von niemandem kontrollierten Animateure der weltweiten Gier, nun am Ausstieg herum. Lagarde sagte, das Gelddrucken müsse langsam zu Ende gehen. Der „Exit“, wie sie das nennt, müsse kontrolliert erfolgen.

Lagarde ist Juristin. Sie hat von Wirtschaft keine Ahnung.

Wovon sie etwas versteht, ist das kalte Spiel der Macht. Sie klammerte sich daher in ihrer Rede an die bekannte Fiktion, an das gefürchtete Instrument der Drohung: Die Staaten müssen alles gemeinsam machen. Nationale Egoismen müssten nun zurücktreten gegenüber dem großen, gemeinsamen Ziel – der Rettung des Weltfinanzsystems.

Doch die Beschwörungen verfangen nicht.

Für den überwiegenden Teil der Menschheit ist das Weltfinanzsystem nichts, was sie retten müssen.

Im Gegenteil: Für 99 Prozent der Menschen ist dieses Monopoly, bei dem sie nichts sind als die kleinen Plastikfiguren, die beim Monopoly hin- und hergeschoben werden, der sichere Untergang.

Marc Faber, der immer wieder etwas schrullig wirkt, versteht von Wirtschaft eine Menge.

Ganz anders als Lagarde sieht er die Konsequenzen: Die Folge der globalen Schuldenblase werden Krieg, soziale Unruhen und Zerstörung sein.

Der sich abzeichnende Crash in den jungen Volkswirtschaften ist ein sicheres Indiz, dass das Endspiel erreicht ist.

Das Bruttosozialprodukt der ganzen Welt, das Faber mit etwa 60 Billionen Dollar beziffert, entspricht dem Umsatz, den die Banken in einer Woche machen. Das Geld, das im Umlauf ist, hat mit der Realität nichts mehr zu tun.

Wenn nun Indien, Indonesien, Brasilien, die Türkei und all die Staaten, in die die Finanzindustrie das Geld in Form von Krediten und Wetten auf diese Kredite gepumpt haben, mit einem Schlag die Balance verlieren – dann ist das ein untrügliches Zeichen dafür, dass die Finanz-Industrie die Leute nicht mehr länger im globalen Schulden-Gefängnis festgehalten werden können.

Es kommt zum Ausbruch.

Lagarde redet immer noch von einem ineinander verwobenen Finanzsystem und behauptet, dass alle gesittet an diesem System mitwirken sollten, damit weiter Geld verdient werden kann mit Werten, die es in der Höhe niemals wird geben können.

Sie übersieht jedoch, dass gerade die Menschen in jenen Staaten, die nun als erste zu fallen drohen, kein Interesse mehr haben an diesem System. So korrupt und von den Banken abhängig kann gar kein Politiker sein, als dass er nicht bei der einsetzenden Beschleunigung merken würde: Jetzt geht es um das Überleben.

Beppe Grillo hat in einem Interview für die BusinessWeek gesagt, dass Italien schleunigst aus der Schuldenfalle kommen müsse. Nicht der Euro sei das Problem, sondern die Schulden. Die italienische Wirtschaft kann die Kredite nicht zurückzahlen, die dieses absurde politische System der Finanzinvestoren ihnen aufgezwungen hat – jene Kredite, die die ganz und gar skrupellosen Politiker gerne genommen haben, um sich bis zur nächsten Wahl am Futtertrog der Macht zu halten.

Doch nun kippt der Futtertrog. Und wenn in Indien, Brasilien oder der Türkei Millionen auf die Straße gehen und das System kurz und klein schlagen, dann hilft kein „financial engineering“ mehr, wie es der IWF so gerne betreiben würde.

 

Russland und China werden folgen.

Und die Euro-Zone wird mit ihrer Schuldenlast mitgerissen werden. Das Ansteigen der Zinsen im Bond-Markt zeigt für Deutschland einen signifikanten Anstieg innerhalb kürzester Zeit. Auch die US-Staatsanleihen stehen schon bei 2 Prozent. Es wird immer teurer für die reichen, großen Schuldner, ihre Kredite zu bedienen.

Daher werde die Dämme nicht nur im Reich von Madame Lagarde brechen, sondern schon sehr bald auch die Grundfesten der westlichen Sozialsysteme unterspült und schließlich zum Einsturz gebracht werden von den gewaltigen Fluten an Geld, das gebraucht wird, um Schulden abzuzahlen. Zypern, Griechenland, Portugal – das sind die Vorboten im Kleinen. Nun kommen die Großen an die Reihe.

Dem Dammbruch wird die Sintflut folgen.

Der Tsunami der globalen Schulden.

Den kann der IWF nicht stoppen, die EZB nicht und auch die US-Notenbank nicht. Die Inflation, die sich jetzt überall in der Welt zusammenbraut, kennt keine nationalen Grenzen.

Das ist der Denkfehler der Alchemisten, die so gerne die neue Weltordnung sehen würden: All das, was die Oligarchen, die dieses System erfunden und von ihm maßlos profitiert haben, in dieses System gesteckt haben, wird sich in der selben, unvorstellbaren Dimension gegen sie selbst richten. Mark Faber sagt, das System geht zu Ende, „entweder durch Krieg oder den finanziellen Kollaps“.

Christine Lagarde glaubt, dass der Crash, den sie in ihrer Rede in Jackson Hole erstaunlich konkret beschreibt, durch noch mehr Kredit verhindert werden könne, durch die Aufgabe von nationaler Souveränität, durch noch härtere Sparmaßnahmen bei den Leuten.

Marc Faber sagt, das Ende werde „sehr schmerzhaft“ sein.

Denn was sich nun zusammenbraut, ist die Inflation des Zorns all jener, die sich betrogen und ausgebeutet sehen, um ihre Zukunft betrogen, in den Sklavenstand zurückversetzt von einer kleinen Elite, die ihnen selbst im Endspiel noch einreden will, dass „Wachstum“ die einzige Lösung sei.

Welches Wachstum?

Das Wachstum der Armut?

Der Ausbeutung?

Des Nichts?

Das Ende wird sehr schmerzhaft sein.