INFORMATION ABOUT THE NEW WESTERN-BACKED LEADERSHIP IN
SYRIA.
The bottom line: If this is SYRIA’S
new government (The National Coalition for SYRIAN Revolutionary and Opposition
Forces)’then SYRIA now has an Islamist regime. This is happening
with the knowledge and collaboration of the Obama Administration and a number
of EUROPEAN governments. It is a catastrophe and one that’s taking place due to
the deliberate decisions of President Barack Obama and other Western leaders.
Even if one rationalizes the Islamist takeover in EGYPT as due to internal
events, this one is U.S.-made.
U.S. and EUROPEAN policy can be
summarized as follows:
“To align with and strengthen Muslim
Brotherhood-associated elements, while painting Salafi forces as the sole real
Islamist danger. At the same time, secular forces are ignored or brushed
aside.”
The new regime, recognized by the UNITED
STATES and most EUROPEAN countries, as the legitimate leadership of the SYRIAN people,
is the SYRIAN National Coalition, which has also established a military
council.
MODERATE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, WISHFUL THINKING
Evidence for these arguments — much
of which comes from raw wire service reports, praise is due to Reuters in this
case — is undeniable. And if we know about these things there’s no doubt that
the highest level of the U.S. government does so as well.
Why is this happening? Because Obama
and others believe that they can moderate the Muslim Brotherhood and it will
tame the Salafists, despite massive evidence to the contrary. This is the
biggest foreign policy blunder of the last century and the cost for it will be
high. It should be stressed that such a strategy is totally unnecessary and the
alternatives have been ignored, the real moderates are being betrayed.
Here is some of the proof for these
assertions:
– “The founder of the Free SYRIAN
Army, former Syrian Air Force Colonel Riad Asaad, is notably absent [from the
leadership]. General Mustafa al-Sheikh, the first of his rank to defect to the
rebels, is also not there. Sheikh is known for his fierce opposition to the
Muslim Brotherhood. Hussein Haj Ali, the highest ranking officer to defect so
far, was similarly absent.” These men are all anti-Islamists.
– “A Reuters report on the new joint
military council calculated that the Muslim Brotherhood and their allies
account for about two-thirds of the 263 men who met in Antalya and formed the
new body. Salafi commanders are also there.” In other words, the Islamists will
get the overwhelming share of weapons provided under U.S. sponsorship, TURKISH
oversight, and QATARI and SAUDI financing. And the UNITED STATES has not
objected to the arming of Salafist super-extremists as long as they aren’t
affiliated to al-Qaida.
– “The new council is headed by
Brigadier Selim Idriss, who is described as a non-ideological military man. But
his deputies, Abdel-basset Tawil of Idleb and Abdel-Qader Saleh of Aleppo
governate are associated with the Salafi trend.” In other words, there’s a
non-Islamist front man for what will be an Islamist-controlled army.
– “The domination by the Muslim
Brotherhood of the new military council mirrors the movement’s leading position
in the new civilian leadership body — the Syrian National Coalition. The leader
of this coalition is Ahmed Mouaz al-Khatib, former Imam of the Umayyad Mosque
in Damascus.
– “Khatib is closely associated with
the Damascus Branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. The leader of the new coalition
has a long history of antisemitic, anti-Western and anti-Shia remarks. (He
praised Saddam Hussein, for example, for “terrifying the Jews” and wrote an
article asking if Facebook was an “AMERICAN-ISRAELI intelligence website.”) He
is also an admirer of the QATAR-based Muslim Brotherhood preacher Sheikh Yusuf
al-Qaradawi.
– “Within the body headed by Khatib,
the Muslim Brotherhood dominated SYRIAN National Council controls around 27 of
the 65 seats on the executive body of the new coalition. There are also
Islamists and fellow travelers among the non-SNC delegates. The Brotherhood is
by far the best organized single body within the coalition. One secular
delegate at the first full meeting of the coalition accused the MB of ‘pushing
more of its hawks into the coalition, although it already has half of the
seats.’”
FURTHERMORE:
– The U.S. government backed the
previous opposition “leadership,” the SYRIAN National Council, which was formed
as a result of AMERICAN initiative operating through Islamist TURKEY. The fact
that this council had a Muslim Brotherhood majority in the leadership did not
deter the Obama Administration from proclaiming it to be the address for
support. Only when the council had clearly failed — and despite the fact that
months earlier several moderates had resigned complaining about Brotherhood
domination — did the U.S. government change strategy to organizing a new, also
Muslim Brotherhood dominated group.
– American intelligence agents in
southern TURKEY supervise the handover of weapons to the rebels. They make no
attempt to stop arms from going to the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists
while they make no attempt to funnel the guns to moderates. The only
restriction is that they not go to al-Qaida affiliated Salafists. One day those
guns will be used to commit unspeakable atrocities against Christians and other
minority groups just as they will be used to install an Islamist regime and
kill or intimidate its opponents.
How has the UNITED STATES handled
this threat? Well, it declared one Salafi group off-limits because it is linked
to al-Qaida. That’s it.
There has been and still is an
alternative: for the West to back non-Islamist leaders including liberals, Arab
nationalists, and KURDISH nationalist forces. Such a strategy was not pursued
either in EGYPT or in TUNISIA.
So when SYRIA gets an anti-Western,
antisemitic, and anti-democratic (aside from holding elections) regime don’t be
surprised. You can read it in the surprised and grudging admissions of the
Western mass media a year or two after this regime takes power or you can know
about it right now.
This outcome might have been inevitable any way but not necessarily true. A vigorous policy of supplying non- and anti-Islamist forces while doing nothing to help the Brotherhood and Salafist militias plus the formation of a non-Islamist dominated political grouping that would receive Western aid could have produced a very different result.
This outcome might have been inevitable any way but not necessarily true. A vigorous policy of supplying non- and anti-Islamist forces while doing nothing to help the Brotherhood and Salafist militias plus the formation of a non-Islamist dominated political grouping that would receive Western aid could have produced a very different result.
But Western, and especiallyUS, policy
is now putting into power yet another anti-Western regime that will oppress its
own people and put a high priority on trying to wipe out ISRAEL.
By Barry Rubin via Global Research
in International Affairs
No comments:
Post a Comment